Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-directory-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 36213 invoked from network); 15 May 2007 19:07:44 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 15 May 2007 19:07:43 -0000 Received: (qmail 89719 invoked by uid 500); 15 May 2007 19:07:49 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-directory-dev-archive@directory.apache.org Received: (qmail 89670 invoked by uid 500); 15 May 2007 19:07:49 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@directory.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: "Apache Directory Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list dev@directory.apache.org Received: (qmail 89659 invoked by uid 99); 15 May 2007 19:07:49 -0000 Received: from herse.apache.org (HELO herse.apache.org) (140.211.11.133) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 15 May 2007 12:07:49 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.0 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (herse.apache.org: domain of akarasulu@gmail.com designates 66.249.92.175 as permitted sender) Received: from [66.249.92.175] (HELO ug-out-1314.google.com) (66.249.92.175) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 15 May 2007 12:07:42 -0700 Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id 71so1310547ugh for ; Tue, 15 May 2007 12:07:19 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references:x-google-sender-auth; b=ihle1BJozlX3eq7YkrVN939cfJhsWA9TFxYLXtgIFrJnXmIhH+y1ROnJHbKvkIolJP9TnjHW68W9tzPbACxDJ2qI6JqCL0eUU3tpfLrGOQadyc8j1O4B3HhT5XJUvjk2jAu0FufwsVRJ6WT/NzP+i0KLTDD4LceHGDNsTE9e/iI= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references:x-google-sender-auth; b=sSN3pFu6ueuaNiHWRxodA9c8tbq+gCKFq1cI1c9iktd8e0K4Gu7+0DlgrPak53DKK9FoNhKCwr9/n+sjvJdUrDQ144nwNA3cY6tpXrXuf2nO+62O7ceOOad40tjjS+upWIL7vnDDkScQX8Z7DWg3VZC5WHC0ixcYYiD14sgsFyk= Received: by 10.66.224.3 with SMTP id w3mr6175115ugg.1179256039497; Tue, 15 May 2007 12:07:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.66.235.5 with HTTP; Tue, 15 May 2007 12:07:19 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Tue, 15 May 2007 15:07:19 -0400 From: "Alex Karasulu" Sender: akarasulu@gmail.com To: "Apache Directory Developers List" , users@directory.apache.org Subject: Re: "Official" name of LDAP Studio In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_6790_29143289.1179256039318" References: <46431166.10007@apache.org> <464326BB.7010808@apache.org> <46455BEB.2020500@apache.org> <46489EE0.6030304@apache.org> X-Google-Sender-Auth: 7e1037ab89ff8964 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org ------=_Part_6790_29143289.1179256039318 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Hey thanks for posting this to the list Emmanuel. BTW I think this should be a public discussion on the dev list. I say this only because our users may give us some better suggestions. I hope no one minds I am just going to post this to the dev/user lists. Regarding this idea: if we go with Apache Directory Studio and have subnames for the various applications supported by the Suite then I think we're stil= l going to need to change the name of the RCP application no? I'm just trying to think of how this idea will manifest itself in the product and what that means with respect to our site and our releases. Alex On 5/14/07, Emmanuel Lecharny wrote: > > We have had an intersting convo with Alex this morning about this naming > issue, as he was stopping by in Paris. He is basically thinking exactly t= he > same : the sooner, the better. > > Then he had a great idea : "Apache Directory Studio" is a suite, includin= g > LdapStudio (which is just a part of the suite). So the official name coul= d > be "Apache Directory Studio", like OpenOffice is about the suite, and > OOwriter, OOcalc, etc are the parts. > > I like this idea very much. > > wdyt ? > > On 5/14/07, Stefan Zoerner wrote: > > > > Emmanuel Lecharny wrote: > > > I have nothing against this name, but remember that "LdapStudio" name > > > has already hit the world ... > > > > > > A lot of people have blogged about it, there are some references on > > many > > > download sites too. > > > > This is exactly why I wish to have a decision as early as possible. > > > > > What about a double name ? > > > > Any concrete proposals? How about simply call it "Studio" in mails etc. > > (instead of LS), and migrate to "Apache Directory Studio" smoothly? > > > > Greetings from Bremen, > > Stefan > > > > ---8<--- > > > > Stefan Zoerner (szoerner@apache.org) > > Committer :: PMC Member > > > > Apache Directory Project > > http://directory.apache.org > > > > > > > -- > Regards, > Cordialement, > Emmanuel L=E9charny > www.iktek.com ------=_Part_6790_29143289.1179256039318 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Hey thanks for posting this to the list Emmanuel. 

BTW I think= this should be a public discussion on the dev list.  I say this only<= br>because our users may give us some better suggestions.  I hope no o= ne minds
I am just going to post this to the dev/user lists.

Regarding this = idea:  if we go with Apache Directory Studio and have subnames
for = the various applications supported by the Suite then I think we're stil= l going to=20
need to change the name of the RCP application no?

I'm just = trying to think of how this idea will manifest itself in the product and wh= at
that means with respect to our site and our releases.

Alex

On 5/14/07, Emmanuel Lecharny <el= echarny@gmail.com> wrote:
We have had an intersting convo with Alex this morning about this naming is= sue, as he was stopping by in Paris. He is basically thinking exactly the s= ame : the sooner, the better.

Then he had a great idea : "Apach= e Directory Studio" is a suite, including LdapStudio (which is just a = part of the suite). So the official name could be "Apache Directory St= udio", like OpenOffice is about the suite, and OOwriter, OOcalc, etc a= re the parts.

I like this idea very much.

wdyt ?


On 5/14/= 07, Stefan Zoerner < szoerner@apache.org> wrote:
Emmanuel L= echarny wrote:
> I have nothing against this name, but remember that = "LdapStudio" name
> has already hit the world ...
>
> A lot of people have= blogged about it, there are some references on many
> download sites= too.

This is exactly why I wish to have a decision as early as poss= ible.

> What about a double name ?

Any concrete proposals? How = about simply call it "Studio" in mails etc.
(instead of LS), a= nd migrate to "Apache Directory Studio" smoothly?

Greeting= s from Bremen,
     Stefan

---8<---

Stefan Zoerne= r (szoerner@apache.org)
Commi= tter :: PMC Member

Apache Directory Project
htt= p://directory.apache.org




--
Regards,
Cordialement,
Emmanuel L=E9charny
www.iktek.com

------=_Part_6790_29143289.1179256039318--