Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-directory-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 63359 invoked from network); 28 May 2007 12:15:56 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 28 May 2007 12:15:56 -0000 Received: (qmail 65080 invoked by uid 500); 28 May 2007 12:16:00 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-directory-dev-archive@directory.apache.org Received: (qmail 65034 invoked by uid 500); 28 May 2007 12:16:00 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@directory.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: "Apache Directory Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list dev@directory.apache.org Received: (qmail 65023 invoked by uid 99); 28 May 2007 12:16:00 -0000 Received: from herse.apache.org (HELO herse.apache.org) (140.211.11.133) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 28 May 2007 05:16:00 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (herse.apache.org: domain of ersin.er@gmail.com designates 64.233.166.180 as permitted sender) Received: from [64.233.166.180] (HELO py-out-1112.google.com) (64.233.166.180) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 28 May 2007 05:15:55 -0700 Received: by py-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id p76so2338304pyb for ; Mon, 28 May 2007 05:15:34 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=o7llaGrxSzScqarsmrgdQl8EBtjijCU9UKg7Kwb8IMILGtKFkOH2kxAjXK3q6wP8ya/DSNCgY3yqk+PH0I72eoRJVNddPDAOV6Bl6xQVjHd+xNVHcSkmuhk4b/4FWXiNdhuzAcp2xJaIpueWHip0/BgF1tAFJwwlJ701QqpTIYk= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=GirXCdDwtEQjm12vsevIY+IEkc2XgXJtvK3+uKUrjFoH9d/ZGT5vtVNihBiXsWfjOK3FpLYL1GolYocwAZ57BXib5XsSzrDN5vAD7IBZbNLEnK1Mvs2vmN5xoEP8as/Ynf80NK8rK3rHMYq4hEwXuRtejl5dstn9osqV6M9Smhw= Received: by 10.35.27.1 with SMTP id e1mr10284240pyj.1180354534375; Mon, 28 May 2007 05:15:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.35.51.6 with HTTP; Mon, 28 May 2007 05:15:34 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Mon, 28 May 2007 15:15:34 +0300 From: "Ersin Er" To: "Apache Directory Developers List" Subject: Re: [Vote] Name of Eclipse tools within Apache Directory In-Reply-To: <465AC4F0.4020707@apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <465AC4F0.4020707@apache.org> X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org 1. [X] Apache Directory Studio : better for future extensions 2. [X] Apache Directory LDAP Studio : better as makes more sense to more users On 5/28/07, Stefan Zoerner wrote: > Hi all, > > before our Eclipse tooling reaches the 1.0, it is appropriate to end all > discussions about the name of the solution. Therefore I would like to > launch the following vote: > > I prefer the following name for our Eclipse tool set > [ ] Apache Directory Studio > [ ] Apache Directory LDAP Studio > [ ] Apache Directory Suite > [ ] None of these. Let's use another, namely ... > > Greetings from Hamburg, > Stefan > > ---8<--- > > Stefan Zoerner (szoerner@apache.org) > Committer :: PMC Member > > Apache Directory Project > http://directory.apache.org > > -- Ersin