Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-directory-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 45440 invoked from network); 21 May 2007 19:15:54 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 21 May 2007 19:15:54 -0000 Received: (qmail 44567 invoked by uid 500); 21 May 2007 19:15:59 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-directory-dev-archive@directory.apache.org Received: (qmail 44521 invoked by uid 500); 21 May 2007 19:15:59 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@directory.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: "Apache Directory Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list dev@directory.apache.org Received: (qmail 44509 invoked by uid 99); 21 May 2007 19:15:59 -0000 Received: from herse.apache.org (HELO herse.apache.org) (140.211.11.133) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 21 May 2007 12:15:59 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (herse.apache.org: domain of ole.ersoy@gmail.com designates 64.233.166.179 as permitted sender) Received: from [64.233.166.179] (HELO py-out-1112.google.com) (64.233.166.179) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 21 May 2007 12:15:50 -0700 Received: by py-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id a73so412712pye for ; Mon, 21 May 2007 12:15:29 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=N0muxxDKO79NyhgKA/8SXKM4kqbD+7pf37p1nVy2o6lq3hziLDBHUmlInrwuGQ/RdS9mZ5So+q+qYfH7E8GujMHV0jm+n6gW6blH/3bBK7j0h/eDnxzjownOwPbUKHP0jsfigLwVe7K5XEtsU8IZKxR7CxZ3WSx/rdQyVNWPYXw= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=TsnF2BjiLVu8+7+tly2rsMtiLpOtD3jmFRKNsw3Zj64Zqou+T0QloZTmT3UigUtECD+8xuKQC1cPiiBGCl1wTol3ISwV7J/QQJsP+U0IF6SH0FuvPz6XUgqeW/X5bOz4IWO+RynoUMCCDMqTLFrHwTgYfkwHxUmKapPsTBdSzus= Received: by 10.35.27.2 with SMTP id e2mr540276pyj.1179774929488; Mon, 21 May 2007 12:15:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?192.168.1.4? ( [24.13.179.233]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id 16sm20290516nzo.2007.05.21.12.15.27; Mon, 21 May 2007 12:15:28 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4651EEA9.2080202@gmail.com> Date: Mon, 21 May 2007 14:10:33 -0500 From: Ole Ersoy User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.10 (X11/20070302) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Apache Directory Developers List Subject: Re: [ApacheDS Webapps] Use Cases References: <4651C9D1.9060901@gmail.com> <4651DA8B.9090605@gmail.com> <4651E318.7020709@gmail.com> <4651E84D.6020402@labeo.de> <4651EBDF.5040407@gmail.com> <4651EEF5.8040205@labeo.de> In-Reply-To: <4651EEF5.8040205@labeo.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Stefan Zoerner wrote: > Ole Ersoy wrote: >> >> Yeah - Would be great if they would just drop the whole thing >> and go with something superior like ADS :-). They did it with >> Geronimo, now it's ADS's turn. >> > I just talked about the WebApp. I do not think that ApacheDS is superior > to TivoliDS yet. TivoliDS has a very solid persistence (DB2) and has > some really large installations in production for ages. Yes - but we all know ApacheDS will smoke it soon :-) Cheers, - Ole