On 5/18/07, Emmanuel Lecharny <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
Enrique Rodriguez a écrit :
> On 5/18/07, Alex Karasulu <email@example.com> wrote:
>> On 5/18/07, Enrique Rodriguez <
>> > ...
>> > PIDs must have gone in at least 1.5 years ago, when we did the first
>> > prototype with OSGi. They are not new. In fact, that's part of the
>> > reason the fqpn needed updating.
>> I thought you had that in a branch. I did not know all this OSGi
>> was going on in the trunk code outside of isolated modules like those
>> osgi subdirectory.
Is it a big deal ? A soon as we keep a track of what those PID are good
for (means : doco), I think we are safe with keeping them in the code, no ?
Yes this is not a big deal. My primary reason for asking was to see if there was more to this
which I could not tell from a cursory view. It's fine keeping them in the code but I would like
to organize things a bit better when I get a chance.