directory-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Alex Karasulu" <akaras...@apache.org>
Subject Re: [jira] Closed: (DIRSERVER-948) Possibly a Bug - See Descrption
Date Thu, 31 May 2007 04:41:38 GMT
Ole, my buddy,

Why put "Possibly a Bug - See Description" into the subject when in JIRA you
can label issues as a
bugs?  Furthermore how do you expect someone looking at a looooong list of
issues in JIRA to know
what you're talking about with such a title?   You cannot expect everyone to
go into that description
just for your issue.

Good god man you have more sense than this: stop, take a breath, pop a
Quaalude if you have to,
and think before you touch your keyboard :).

Alex

On 5/30/07, Ole Ersoy (JIRA) <jira@apache.org> wrote:
>
>
>      [
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRSERVER-948?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel]
>
> Ole Ersoy closed DIRSERVER-948.
> -------------------------------
>
>     Resolution: Fixed
>
> Whooopseee - Got it.
>
> The members on  AbstractTypeCreator
> were static.
>
> When the MetaTopSDOObjectClassCreator
> runs, it also creates the AttributeType
> entries that it needs, and these
> creators also use the AbstractTypeCreator.
>
> So the AbstractTypeCreator members
> were getting shared...
>
> > Possibly a Bug - See Descrption
> > -------------------------------
> >
> >                 Key: DIRSERVER-948
> >                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRSERVER-948
> >             Project: Directory ApacheDS
> >          Issue Type: Bug
> >         Environment: FC6
> >            Reporter: Ole Ersoy
> >            Priority: Minor
> >
> > I'll check the test in that shows this when I
> > check in the DAS.
> > I have a parent class that does this:
> > public abstract class AbstractTypeCreator
> > implements
> > EnumeratedSchemaAttributeTypeValues,
> > SchemaAttributeTypeConstants,
> > AttributeTypeConstants,
> > SchemaObjectClassConstants,
> > ObjectClassConstants,
> > DASConstants
> > {
> >     protected static Attribute objectClassAttribute;
> >     protected static Attributes basicAttributes;
> >
> >     protected static void create()
> >     {
> >         objectClassAttribute    =
> >             new BasicAttribute(
> >                 OBJECT_CLASS, TOP );
> >
> >         objectClassAttribute.add(
> >             META_TOP );
> >
> >         basicAttributes = new BasicAttributes();
> >         basicAttributes.put(objectClassAttribute);
> >         basicAttributes.put( M_OBSOLETE, LDAP_FALSE );
> >     }
> > }
> > What I want to do is leverage the work in
> > this parent class here.  Notice I have
> > commented out the
> > work that the parent class does.
> > package org.apache.tuscany.das.ldap.schema.create;
> > import javax.naming.NamingException;
> > import javax.naming.directory.Attribute;
> > import javax.naming.directory.BasicAttribute;
> > import javax.naming.directory.BasicAttributes;
> > import javax.naming.directory.DirContext;
> > public class MetaTopSDOObjectClassCreator
> > extends AbstractTypeCreator
> > {
> >     public static void create(
> >         DirContext attributeTypesContext,
> >         DirContext objectClassesContext,
> >         String oidPrefix)
> >     throws NamingException, Exception
> >     {
> >         //Here's where we initialize the parent
> >         AbstractTypeCreator.create();
> >
> >         MComplexMayAttributeTypeCreator.create(
> >             attributeTypesContext,
> >             oidPrefix );
> >
> >         MComplexMustAttributeTypeCreator.create(
> >             attributeTypesContext,
> >             oidPrefix );
> >
> >         /* Commenting out the work that the parent does
> >         Attribute objectClassAttribute    =
> >             new BasicAttribute(
> >                 OBJECT_CLASS,
> >                 TOP );
> >
> >         objectClassAttribute.add(
> >             META_TOP );
> >             */
> >
> >         objectClassAttribute.add( META_OBJECT_CLASS );
> >
> >         //basicAttributes = new BasicAttributes(); parent does this work
> >         basicAttributes.put(objectClassAttribute);
> > //        basicAttributes.put( M_OBSOLETE, LDAP_FALSE ); parent does
> this work
> >         basicAttributes.put( M_MAY,               M_COMPLEX_MAY);
> >         basicAttributes.put( M_MAY,               M_COMPLEX_MUST);
> >         basicAttributes.put( M_OBSOLETE,          LDAP_FALSE );
> >         basicAttributes.put( M_SUP_OBJECT_CLASS,  META_OBJECT_CLASS );
> >         basicAttributes.put( M_TYPE_OBJECT_CLASS, STRUCTURAL);
> >         basicAttributes.put(
> M_NAME,              M_META_TOP_SDO_OBJECT_CLASS);
> >         basicAttributes.put( M_DESCRIPTION,
> >             "Meta ObjectClass for all SDO DataObjects" );
> >
> >         String rdn =
> >             ComplexTypeRDNCreator.create(
> >                 oidPrefix,
> >                 DAS_XSD_NAMESPACE,
> >                 M_META_TOP_SDO_OBJECT_CLASS);
> >         objectClassesContext.createSubcontext(
> >             rdn, basicAttributes );
> >     }
> > }
> > Now when I run the test
> > MetaTopSDOObjectClassCreatorTest (I'll check it
> > in when I check in the DAS)
> > I get this:
> > javax.naming.InvalidNameException: m-oid=
> 1.3.6.1.4.1.18060.4.99985052.4991015.9998535.5410097.9495056.0251549.9857505.52551005.48:
> [LDAP: error code 64 - failed to add entry m-oid=
> 1.3.6.1.4.1.18060.4.99985052.4991015.9998535.5410097.9495056.0251549.9857505.52551005.48,ou=objectClasses,cn=das,ou=schema:
> The parent entry of a attributeType should have a relative name of
> ou=attributeTypes.]; remaining name 'm-oid=
> 1.3.6.1.4.1.18060.4.99985052.4991015.9998535.5410097.9495056.0251549.9857505.52551005.48
> '
> >       at com.sun.jndi.ldap.LdapCtx.processReturnCode(LdapCtx.java:2943)
> >       at com.sun.jndi.ldap.LdapCtx.processReturnCode(LdapCtx.java:2758)
> > However if I comment
> > the line
> > ===================================
> > AbstractTypeCreator.create();
> > ===================================
> > And uncomment these:
> > ===================================
> >       Attribute objectClassAttribute    =
> >             new BasicAttribute(
> >                 OBJECT_CLASS,
> >                 TOP );
> >
> >         objectClassAttribute.add(
> >             META_TOP );
> >
> >         objectClassAttribute.add( META_OBJECT_CLASS );
> >
> >         basicAttributes = new BasicAttributes();
> >         basicAttributes.put(objectClassAttribute);
> >         basicAttributes.put( M_OBSOLETE, LDAP_FALSE );
> > The same exact test runs fine.
> > It seems to me that test should run fine in either case...
> > For some reason it now thinks that I'm trying to create
> > an AttributeType entry...
>
> --
> This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
> -
> You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
>
>

Mime
View raw message