directory-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Chris Custine" <chris.cust...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [Vote] Versionning scheme
Date Sun, 27 May 2007 16:41:33 GMT
Yeah, I think this is fine.  I just wasn't sure if I was reading it wrong.

Sounds great!

Chris

On 5/27/07, Emmanuel Lecharny <elecharny@apache.org> wrote:
>
> Chris Custine a écrit :
>
> > [x] +1 : This numbering scheme fits me
> >
> > Sounds good to me guys.  One thing that wasn't clear to me though, are
> we
> > literally talking about 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0 progression or are you
> talking
> > about any non whole number (like 1.5, 1.6, 1.7) for transitional
> > versions?
> > Either way is fine with me, I just wanted to make sure I understood
> > correctly.
>
> 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0 progression should be ok, to keep the semantic clear.
> We can go for any 1.5.X versions if needed.
>
> wdyt ?
>
>

Mime
View raw message