Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-directory-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 29563 invoked from network); 6 Apr 2007 02:18:32 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 6 Apr 2007 02:18:31 -0000 Received: (qmail 36188 invoked by uid 500); 6 Apr 2007 02:18:38 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-directory-dev-archive@directory.apache.org Received: (qmail 35957 invoked by uid 500); 6 Apr 2007 02:18:38 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@directory.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: "Apache Directory Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list dev@directory.apache.org Received: (qmail 35946 invoked by uid 99); 6 Apr 2007 02:18:38 -0000 Received: from herse.apache.org (HELO herse.apache.org) (140.211.11.133) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 05 Apr 2007 19:18:38 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (herse.apache.org: domain of ole.ersoy@gmail.com designates 64.233.166.178 as permitted sender) Received: from [64.233.166.178] (HELO py-out-1112.google.com) (64.233.166.178) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 05 Apr 2007 19:18:29 -0700 Received: by py-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id a29so376378pyi for ; Thu, 05 Apr 2007 19:18:09 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=JU4AbkoZZNFPhBmXeP+TgbTv97Z24GLjD/nCqiEf6zj4Cm871hokoAjYJM6YCg9az9SjtInHcCEpYcapd8xYfeKs7OxOyCpA2eSqFgydsyM6Hg10sFbRhz14dN2UZY2Bokkx1x7MqxB3L4qVchVSzHFEZWamg7SMogv91aar9R4= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=Y+h6HH0rBjOT9RZGEOPuCa/IVRzCzA/MDWTJpoglCZBA8mmCvAOdM4OLPYBgK+hY75km/bnSBYQFkkuzeTpNy5oLOWmc8cU5HCnbWldlk3nGEOgbghRecGd7F2YCahXTQb67n7uRC62JSpXrnxyXuiwgnUiu1rkExhTHdBSXqXQ= Received: by 10.65.224.11 with SMTP id b11mr4947106qbr.1175825888989; Thu, 05 Apr 2007 19:18:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?192.168.1.24? ( [24.13.179.233]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id 20sm11033615nzp.2007.04.05.19.18.08; Thu, 05 Apr 2007 19:18:08 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4615AD11.3000507@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 05 Apr 2007 21:14:41 -0500 From: Ole Ersoy User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.10 (X11/20070302) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Apache Directory Developers List Subject: Re: [SCHEMA] Can two different LDAP AttributeType's have the same name? References: <46157D32.3080103@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Well, It does make life simpler when there's one simple rule like that :-) It's also a little easier to visually track everything like that. Although now instead of just having an attribute name on an entry like "baseDN" we have to call it: org.apache.tuscany.DASConfig.baseDN I assume this does not really matter that much, because I'm guessing that even though we have 200,000,000 entries with the ObjectClass DASConfig, org.apache.tuscany.DASConfig.baseDN is not repeated 200,000,000 for each entry. It's only stored on the ObjectClass right? So the only additional storage incurred is from the values of the entries? Thanks, - Ole