Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-directory-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 77274 invoked from network); 3 Apr 2007 22:29:49 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 3 Apr 2007 22:29:49 -0000 Received: (qmail 81749 invoked by uid 500); 3 Apr 2007 22:29:55 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-directory-dev-archive@directory.apache.org Received: (qmail 81715 invoked by uid 500); 3 Apr 2007 22:29:55 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@directory.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: "Apache Directory Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list dev@directory.apache.org Received: (qmail 81704 invoked by uid 99); 3 Apr 2007 22:29:55 -0000 Received: from herse.apache.org (HELO herse.apache.org) (140.211.11.133) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 03 Apr 2007 15:29:55 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.4 required=10.0 tests=SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (herse.apache.org: 212.27.42.35 is neither permitted nor denied by domain of elecharny@gmail.com) Received: from [212.27.42.35] (HELO smtp5-g19.free.fr) (212.27.42.35) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 03 Apr 2007 15:29:47 -0700 Received: from [192.168.0.1] (vol75-3-82-66-216-176.fbx.proxad.net [82.66.216.176]) by smtp5-g19.free.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id D027B44F77 for ; Wed, 4 Apr 2007 00:29:26 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <4612D546.8090402@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 04 Apr 2007 00:29:26 +0200 From: Emmanuel Lecharny User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (X11/20050923) X-Accept-Language: fr, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Apache Directory Developers List Subject: Re: [DAS to LDAP Type Mapping] Am I thinking about this right? References: <46117D51.1030007@gmail.com> <461186C2.7060201@gmail.com> <46119CF6.10705@gmail.com> <5a75db780704031524o11aaa984gbdf6476932551a45@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <5a75db780704031524o11aaa984gbdf6476932551a45@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Luciano Resende a �crit : > Ole, before I ask this, let me state that I'm not an Expert on LDAP :) > > You said : > >> I want to store a DataObject in ADS. > > > What are the benefits of storing the SDO into the LDAP Server repository > versus mapping the SDO properties to a existent objectClass using LDAP > APIs? I think it may be interesting if you want to get serialized objects from one of its attribute > > > If you use a pure LDAP API, would you still be able to read that same > object > ? Of course, but it will be a instance of the object, and you won't be able to search for all objects with a specific attribute. I think this is what Ele is trying to implement. Emmanuel