Mailing-List: contact dev-help@directory.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: "Apache Directory Developers List" <dev@directory.apache.org>
Message-ID: <31429087.1177154415796.JavaMail.jira@brutus>
Date: Sat, 21 Apr 2007 04:20:15 -0700 (PDT)
From: "Emmanuel Lecharny (JIRA)" <jira@apache.org>
To: dev@directory.apache.org
Subject: [jira] Closed: (DIRSERVER-294) Proposed change to the vendorVersion
 attribute format.
In-Reply-To: <1996690763.1128604847921.JavaMail.jira@ajax.apache.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit


     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRSERVER-294?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Emmanuel Lecharny closed DIRSERVER-294.
---------------------------------------


Closing all issues created in 2005 and before which are marked resolved

> Proposed change to the vendorVersion attribute format.
> ------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: DIRSERVER-294
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRSERVER-294
>             Project: Directory ApacheDS
>          Issue Type: Wish
>    Affects Versions: pre-1.0
>            Reporter: Kirill Kovalenko
>         Assigned To: Alex Karasulu
>            Priority: Trivial
>             Fix For: 1.0-RC1
>
>
> I just have a suggestion for the vendorVersion attribute format that you use. Now it's something like this: $Rev: 123456. For many people subversion revision number is meaningless and says nothing. I suggest something more standard like 'major.minor.revison.build'. For example - '0.9.3.123456'. Such approach allows people that have no idea of subversion revision to identify server version easily.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.