Make sense to fix the problem only on platforms where it matters.
I'm not really a big fan of a lowercased name with no space.
Although, I have also experienced the problem on Ubuntu at the office. I had to remove the space on the name of the folder and the executable.
So, I agree with you guys, the generic name of the product should stay LDAP Studio (with this case and the space) but I think that in the *Linux* distribution packages (i386 and PPC) the name of the folder should be replaced by ldapstudio and the so does the name of the executable.
So, I am :
+1 for 'ldapstudio' on Linux packages (i386 & PPC)
-1 for 'ldapstudio' on other platforms packages (even Windows, because I don't think this is a real issue on this OS).
P-AOn 4/19/07, Chris Custine < email@example.com> wrote:I am also running under Linux and while the current setup works just fine, I agree that it would be a great idea to lose the space and go to all lower case on Linux just to be safe and match best practices.
On 4/19/07, Emmanuel Lecharny <firstname.lastname@example.org > wrote:ldapstudio is ok for me. Even under w$, this is painfull to have a space. I never compnained about the space, because now Linux is adding the '\ ' for me, but I agree with alex that ldapstudio is better
so +1 for ldapstudio--On 4/19/07, Alex Karasulu < email@example.com> wrote:Hi guys,
I just installed LDAP Studio .7 on another machine (UNIX) and realized that I don't like the extra space in the folder for 'LDAP Studio'. Does any other UNIX bigot share this same peeve with me?
Is it OK with LS team to use ldapstudio instead. I'd rather be more UNIX friendly than MAC or M$ friendly but this is just my old bigotted self. If there is an issue with doing this I'll survive :).