directory-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Luciano Resende" <luckbr1...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [DAS] Is there something holy about ou=schema?
Date Sun, 08 Apr 2007 00:49:39 GMT
My understanding is that you are going to base this on Tuscany SDO/DAS, if
this is the case, should we use a different name for ou=ecore ?

On 4/7/07, Ole Ersoy <ole.ersoy@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Good idea.
>
> I'll just make a partition
> ou=ecore.
>
> Then all the DAS metadata that has the same semantics
> as ou=schema metadata can go there.
>
> We'll make another one..ou=tuscany or something
> for Tuscany metadata...I have to find out what it should
> be called exactly.
>
> Thanks,
> - Ole
>
>
>
> Emmanuel Lecharny wrote:
> > Ole Ersoy a écrit :
> >
> >> I think it would be a good idea
> >> to store SDO Package metadata
> >> under:
> >>
> >> DN: ou=ePackages, ou=schema
> >>
> >> Just wanted to make sure that's ok?
> >
> > As a general rule of thumb, don't mess with built-in partitions...
> >
> > why don't you use your own partition "ou=ePackages" ?
> >
> > Emmanuel
> >
> >
>



-- 
Luciano Resende
http://people.apache.org/~lresende

Mime
View raw message