directory-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Emmanuel Lecharny (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] Closed: (DIRSERVER-435) delegating binds to custom partitions
Date Sat, 21 Apr 2007 11:18:17 GMT

     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRSERVER-435?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]

Emmanuel Lecharny closed DIRSERVER-435.
---------------------------------------


Closing all issues created in 2005 and before which are marked resolved

> delegating binds to custom partitions
> -------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: DIRSERVER-435
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRSERVER-435
>             Project: Directory ApacheDS
>          Issue Type: New Feature
>         Environment: jdk1.4.2
>            Reporter: Norval Hope
>         Assigned To: Alex Karasulu
>             Fix For: 1.0-RC1
>
>         Attachments: delegate_bind.patch
>
>
> I have created a patch which permits SimpleAuthenticator to optionally delegate bind
calls to the custom partition matching the DN provided to a bind call. This seems like the
right general approach to take, but there were some points I wasn't completely certain about
(being a noob):
>     1) I pass the credentials in as a Object (rather then byte[]) to allow for future
flexibility when SASL support is added to DS.
>     2) The bind() call returns an InitialContext which SimpleAuthenticator immediately
closes, rather then say returning a boolean. This seems sensible though.
>     3) Given the new bind() call is only optionally implemented by a ContextPartition,
the default bases classes return null when it is called. A NotImplementedException type approach
would work just as well, but I am unsure how the relative pros and cons are preceived by the
core DS developers (runtime cost versus cleanliness).
> I also realise that the bind call is only one of a number of delegations that will eventually
need to be supported to custom partitions, but hope that this patch isn't heading in the wrong
direction and thus compromising any future work that may be required.
> If the patch is deemed useful, but further work is required due to any/all of the reasons
above (or some I haven't considered) then let me know.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.


Mime
View raw message