Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-directory-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 60747 invoked from network); 21 Mar 2007 16:55:45 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 21 Mar 2007 16:55:45 -0000 Received: (qmail 79435 invoked by uid 500); 21 Mar 2007 16:55:53 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-directory-dev-archive@directory.apache.org Received: (qmail 79403 invoked by uid 500); 21 Mar 2007 16:55:52 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@directory.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: "Apache Directory Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list dev@directory.apache.org Received: (qmail 79392 invoked by uid 99); 21 Mar 2007 16:55:52 -0000 Received: from herse.apache.org (HELO herse.apache.org) (140.211.11.133) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 21 Mar 2007 09:55:52 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.0 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (herse.apache.org: domain of elecharny@gmail.com designates 64.233.182.189 as permitted sender) Received: from [64.233.182.189] (HELO nf-out-0910.google.com) (64.233.182.189) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 21 Mar 2007 09:55:42 -0700 Received: by nf-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id n15so1010279nfc for ; Wed, 21 Mar 2007 09:55:20 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=psaAkF55LpBCNvonH0ZKHi0GyoSaZ8883xuvlEWNEIcee0AhS4zszxNNCBOCSCJbgLA4e/07pX4MFd1SFgpzQ0cHuBgLEyRsgMqZMC74EEmdoRONW9cqBoUJv+u8TJP/PVY3NQELkivf6K32bOR52D5YPx7DVyTpNBmTD9OvgXo= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=sQgXkjlyiXPM/qRULyaviJs6h6ca4UQX7j3gYmjiVLHN5MLGHGUigvep1Ev0Yk0JzE12Vg3YwhUFKRJi2Q+58BcJSLoA9c8pemD5zMnhwkagzQ1ePKx/1323dfBUyh8gQHef1b1IDzg8gMJuDW7SgbQmbFhhiyU8+mdBBVTR2aY= Received: by 10.78.164.9 with SMTP id m9mr482131hue.1174496120163; Wed, 21 Mar 2007 09:55:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.78.23.3 with HTTP; Wed, 21 Mar 2007 09:55:20 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2007 17:55:20 +0100 From: "Emmanuel Lecharny" Reply-To: elecharny@iktek.com To: "Apache Directory Developers List" Subject: Re: Java5 required for 1.0.1? In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_180019_12726832.1174496120108" References: X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org ------=_Part_180019_12726832.1174496120108 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Hi Greag, no, 1.0.1 is supposed to work well with 1.4. We might have some problem in 1.0.1, so it would be very kind to just fill a JIRA issue to give more information about the problem you have : which is the offending class, whic= h JVM are you using, which version, etc. I suspect we have introduced a fix in both 1.5.0 and 1.0.1. Is it possible that it's related to Spring 1.2.8 ? On 3/21/07, Gregg Freeman wrote: > > Hi, > > We're using an embedded Apache DS in one of our servers, and have been > using 1.0.0-RC4 for a while. I recently (a week or 2 ago), decided to tr= y > to upgrade to 1.0.1 , but I ran into a problem with some ClassNotFound > Exceptions on a new Java5 class. > > I just assumed that the 1.0.1 release required Java5, but a recent note o= n > the list made me start to wonder. > > So, does 1.0.1 require Java5? > > Best Regards, > > Gregg > > _______________________________________ > Gregg Freeman > Director, Development & Services > > *Seagull Software* > Tel: +1 816-272-5610 > Mobile: +1 816-695-3924 > Email: * **gfreeman@seagullsoftware.com * > Web: *www.seagullsoftware.com* > *__________________________________* > *Where SOA and BPM Meet the Mainframe* > > > --=20 Cordialement, Emmanuel L=E9charny www.iktek.com ------=_Part_180019_12726832.1174496120108 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Hi Greag,

no, 1.0.1 is supposed to work well with 1.4. We might have= some problem in 1.0.1, so it would be very kind to just fill a JIRA issue = to give more information about the problem you have : which is the offendin= g class, which JVM are you using, which version, etc.

I suspect we have introduced a fix in both 1.5.0 and 1.0.1. Is it p= ossible that it's related to Spring 1.2.8 ?

On 3/21/07, Gregg Freeman &l= t; GFreeman@seagullsoftware.= com > wrote:
Hi,
 
We're using an = embedded Apache DS in one of our servers, and have been using 1.0.0-RC4 for= a while.  I recently (a week or 2 ago), decided to try to upgrade to = 1.0.1 , but I ran into a problem with some ClassNotFound Exceptions on a new Java= 5 class.
 
I just assumed that= the 1.0.1 release required Java5, but a recent note on the list made me st= art to wonder.
 
So, does 1.0.1 requ= ire Java5?
 
Best Regards,
 
Gregg
 
_______________________________________
Gregg Freeman
Director, Development & Services<= font color=3D"#000000" face=3D"Arial, sans-serif" size=3D"3">
 
Seagull Software
Tel:    +1 816-272-5610
Mobile: +1 816-695-3924
Email: <= u> gfreeman@s= eagullsoftware.com
Web:    www.seagullsoftware.com
__________________________________
Where SOA and BPM Meet the Mainframe
 
 



--
Cordialement,
Emmanu= el L=E9charny
www.iktek.com ------=_Part_180019_12726832.1174496120108--