Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-directory-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 14560 invoked from network); 27 Mar 2007 14:59:55 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 27 Mar 2007 14:59:55 -0000 Received: (qmail 45909 invoked by uid 500); 27 Mar 2007 15:00:02 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-directory-dev-archive@directory.apache.org Received: (qmail 45695 invoked by uid 500); 27 Mar 2007 15:00:02 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@directory.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: "Apache Directory Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list dev@directory.apache.org Received: (qmail 45684 invoked by uid 99); 27 Mar 2007 15:00:02 -0000 Received: from herse.apache.org (HELO herse.apache.org) (140.211.11.133) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 27 Mar 2007 08:00:02 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.0 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (herse.apache.org: domain of akarasulu@gmail.com designates 66.249.82.230 as permitted sender) Received: from [66.249.82.230] (HELO wx-out-0506.google.com) (66.249.82.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 27 Mar 2007 07:59:53 -0700 Received: by wx-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id h31so2503122wxd for ; Tue, 27 Mar 2007 07:59:32 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references:x-google-sender-auth; b=t3y5Jqpn5gIyefg36w6JXE91jxYnxjlQ/uzfT2tWVh1IMN8nnJ84RAw1f/6CNOBLGl36j5MpSMkze8OAwMuAwv3o7ezc9iMik1x1MHnStIPp8SpxQGvi1NGyu1Y9p1wC73zKx0OEiiuHxbbivfvWThw9Q+oZxeB1FmMcOCHW6aE= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references:x-google-sender-auth; b=mDTruiGhxTe7FjWrg+KOPRC9AYw4bLsyCz6Ys7DaEXKJSNpICnnVcXlLyKSIwnW6bcYw2D38xPoPa3pfzcZErW4qI6B+KOeULy/ShIee+89RQJoIs3MqXAIktd2aST6hgBuu8TNe3Id1qm3xQS51G3jciji3/oll/a7DkNrDs8Q= Received: by 10.70.57.8 with SMTP id f8mr12891335wxa.1175007572450; Tue, 27 Mar 2007 07:59:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.70.78.18 with HTTP; Tue, 27 Mar 2007 07:59:32 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2007 10:59:32 -0400 From: "Alex Karasulu" Sender: akarasulu@gmail.com To: "Apache Directory Developers List" Subject: Re: Java5 required for 1.0.1? In-Reply-To: <390efba50703261215n19571d65v1f934f0f078cca27@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_3621_14244365.1175007572373" References: <46050009.8050903@gmail.com> <390efba50703261215n19571d65v1f934f0f078cca27@mail.gmail.com> X-Google-Sender-Auth: 8a93ca26c3b42492 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org ------=_Part_3621_14244365.1175007572373 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Why are we archiving the 1.0.x branch? Emmanuel did you move this? Or is someone outside of the project moving our stuff over? Alex On 3/26/07, Christine Koppelt wrote: > > Hi Gary, > > 1.0.0 was moved to the archive, i fixed the website link a few days > ago. Actually it should be ok now. > You can find the 1.0.0 release here: > http://archive.apache.org/dist/directory/apacheds/stable/1.0/1.0.0/ > > regards > > Christine > > > 2007/3/26, Gary Gregory : > > Merci Emmanuel, I'll wait for 1.0.2 and stay on 1.0 for now. BTW, the > last time I checked, we could not download 1.0 anymore, only 1.0.1. > > > > Thank you, > > Gary > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: Emmanuel Lecharny [mailto:elecharny@gmail.com] > > > Sent: Saturday, March 24, 2007 3:40 AM > > > To: Gary Gregory > > > Cc: Apache Directory Developers List; elecharny@iktek.com > > > Subject: Re: Java5 required for 1.0.1? > > > > > > Gary Gregory a =E9crit : > > > > > > >Hello All: > > > > > > > >I ran into this about a month ago and created this ticket: > > > http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRSERVER-861 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Gary, > > > > > > you were right : I introduced some java 5 pieces of code in 1.0.1, I > > > guess. It has been fixed, and will be released (1.0.2) very soon. We > > > have 5 more bugs to fix or to postpone, so I'm launching the vote for > > > this new version, hopefully it will be available at the end of next > week. > > > > > > Emmanuel > > > > > > PS: if you are in a hurry, you can just get the source from SVN and > > > build it. > > > > > > Hope it helps ! > > > > > ------=_Part_3621_14244365.1175007572373 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline
Why are we archiving the 1.0.x branch?  Emmanuel did you&nbs= p;move this?  Or is someone outside of the
project moving our stuff over?
 
Alex

 
On 3/26/07, = Christine Koppelt <christine.koppelt@googlemail.com> wrote:
Hi Gary,

1.0.0 was moved = to the archive, i fixed the website link a few days
ago. Actually it sho= uld be ok now.
You can find the 1.0.0 release here:
http://archive.apache.org/= dist/directory/apacheds/stable/1.0/1.0.0/

regards

Christi= ne


2007/3/26, Gary Gregory <ggregory@seagullsoftware.com>:
> Merci Emmanuel, = I'll wait for 1.0.2 and stay on 1.0 for now. BTW, the last time I check= ed, we could not download=20 1.0 anymore, only 1.0.1.
>
> Thank you,
> Gary
> &g= t; -----Original Message-----
> > From: Emmanuel Lecharny [mailto:= elecharny@gmail.com]
> >= ; Sent: Saturday, March 24, 2007 3:40 AM
> > To: Gary Gregory
> > Cc: Apache Directory Developers= List; elecharny@iktek.com
&g= t; > Subject: Re: Java5 required for 1.0.1?
> >
> > Ga= ry Gregory a =E9crit :
> >
> > >Hello All:
> > >
> > &g= t;I ran into this about a month ago and created this ticket:
> > <= a href=3D"http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRSERVER-861">http://issues= .apache.org/jira/browse/DIRSERVER-861
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > Gar= y,
> >
> > you were right : I introduced some java 5 piec= es of code in 1.0.1, I
> > guess. It has been fixed, and will be r= eleased ( 1.0.2) very soon. We
> > have 5 more bugs to fix or to postpone, s= o I'm launching the vote for
> > this new version, hopefully i= t will be available at the end of next week.
> >
> > Emma= nuel
> >
> > PS: if you are in a hurry, you can just get the = source from SVN and
> > build it.
> >
> > Hope i= t helps !
>
>

------=_Part_3621_14244365.1175007572373--