Mailing-List: contact dev-help@directory.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: "Apache Directory Developers List" <dev@directory.apache.org>
Received-SPF: pass (herse.apache.org: domain of ersin.er@gmail.com designates
 64.233.184.232 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=beta;
        h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references;
        b=PIi9/3mkWTzS5FNe41Ss87yIhzQ6iJcCwQV5EkHiyKxeFFIuhDEGfBV9ahBv+VX4DICyMNAAlEhkR+E2GDOxs9ZqZiSM1CJ/8ox4GK2pds8tSBGhMcU1P002DNd7OZb1Q8swM7GaNsVl6IJ4v1lBzShfGRZd9dH817GEPSlk8FM=
Message-ID: <a1b4a6610703170936y6a16c162v945aa1cacb43478b@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 17 Mar 2007 18:36:14 +0200
From: "Ersin Er" <ersin.er@gmail.com>
To: "Apache Directory Developers List" <dev@directory.apache.org>
Subject: Re: [core] Loading stored-procedures and setting triggers
In-Reply-To: <a1b4a6610703161351x611e0dfbr724bb08e5a0151e3@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <568753d90703161203q5df0a56dpe9a7073db03cf76c@mail.gmail.com>
	 <a1b4a6610703161259y4b622ea3ua1f23e7f85f4a785@mail.gmail.com>
	 <568753d90703161308x7b62c720lb66d71a352f8fda7@mail.gmail.com>
	 <a1b4a6610703161351x611e0dfbr724bb08e5a0151e3@mail.gmail.com>

On 3/16/07, Ersin Er <ersin.er@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 3/16/07, Enrique Rodriguez <enriquer9@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On 3/16/07, Ersin Er <ersin.er@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > ...
> > > BTW, I plan to work on these two stuff and their documentation this
> > > weekend so I suggest you stay tuned.
> >
> > One question, not obvious from the test cases, was:  Can you perform 2
> > operations in a specific order in the same TED on the same attribute?
> > Back to the userPassword use-case, I'd like to (1) derive keys from
> > the userPassword and then (2) delete the plaintext userPassword, since
> > it is no longer needed.
>
> Currently no. It's on TODO. My proposals were executing Triggers with
> creation time order and the other one was a Precedence specifier in
> the grammar. We'll figure it out soon.

OK, now done. I have made some changes to the TriggerSpecification
grammar and TriggerService code. Now, we have guarantied ordered
execution of multiple SPs per Trigger execution.

Changes are here:

http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&revision=519364

Particularly the test case reflecting the change is here:

http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/directory/apacheds/trunk/core-unit/src/test/java/org/apache/directory/server/core/trigger/DefaulTriggerServiceITest.java?revision=519364&view=markup

> > Enrique
> >
>
>
> --
> Ersin
>

We have more work to do. Hopefully I'll spend more time on this stuff
these days.

Cheers,

-- 
Ersin