Mailing-List: contact dev-help@directory.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: "Apache Directory Developers List" <dev@directory.apache.org>
Received-SPF: pass (herse.apache.org: local policy)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
  s=s1024; d=yahoo.com;
  h=Received:X-YMail-OSG:Mime-Version:In-Reply-To:References:Content-Type:Message-Id:Content-Transfer-Encoding:From:Subject:Date:To:X-Mailer;
  b=vznOFEUWlPxk9kHB1OokNWIM9UVkhxILhxlfb4j9VhGDgLXQdFhHexJZ9QqQVXx7R2LSuuGBhwPRlzfdlSIS6uwxVRj5P3xzML6+fcQb3mmwNWBCyhgmVe3ebBF1pbTOH1UyzgouR77iidlWFE/xhq8QzCgl3wQMNdBeLj2otPg=
  ;
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.3)
In-Reply-To: <4604FFBE.1050508@gmail.com>
References: <4604FFBE.1050508@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed
Message-Id: <5C501DFF-662E-4726-B348-5E64727227C3@yahoo.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: David Jencks <david_jencks@yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: [1.5.0 release] take 2
Date: Sun, 25 Mar 2007 20:16:06 -0400
To: "Apache Directory Developers List" <dev@directory.apache.org>

I've never heard of anyone having 2x72 hour waits, nor do I  
understand why we would.  My impression is that votes are changeable  
so if a serious problem  shows up in the 72 hours we just fix it,  
retag, and try again.

thanks
david jencks

On Mar 24, 2007, at 6:38 AM, Emmanuel Lecharny wrote:

> Hi,
>
> ok, the IP issues are gone, we don't any more depend on  
> BouncyCastle jars, thanks to Enrique good work, so I guess we are  
> ready for a new vote. However, as stated by David Jencks, it may be  
> good to slightly change the process :
> 1) we tag this version (1.5.0-freeze, for instance)
> 2) we wait for a certain amount of time (let's say 72 hours)
> 3) if nobody as any objection, we launch a vote
> 4) 72 more hours to wait
> 5) no -1 ? we have a new ADS 1.5.0 release !
>
> wdyt ?