Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-directory-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 99201 invoked from network); 24 Mar 2007 10:39:17 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 24 Mar 2007 10:39:17 -0000 Received: (qmail 24817 invoked by uid 500); 24 Mar 2007 10:39:24 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-directory-dev-archive@directory.apache.org Received: (qmail 24773 invoked by uid 500); 24 Mar 2007 10:39:24 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@directory.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: "Apache Directory Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list dev@directory.apache.org Received: (qmail 24762 invoked by uid 99); 24 Mar 2007 10:39:24 -0000 Received: from herse.apache.org (HELO herse.apache.org) (140.211.11.133) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 24 Mar 2007 03:39:24 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.4 required=10.0 tests=SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (herse.apache.org: 212.27.42.35 is neither permitted nor denied by domain of elecharny@gmail.com) Received: from [212.27.42.35] (HELO smtp5-g19.free.fr) (212.27.42.35) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 24 Mar 2007 03:39:16 -0700 Received: from [192.168.0.1] (vol75-3-82-66-216-176.fbx.proxad.net [82.66.216.176]) by smtp5-g19.free.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1CA0A9084 for ; Sat, 24 Mar 2007 11:38:55 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <4604FFBE.1050508@gmail.com> Date: Sat, 24 Mar 2007 11:38:54 +0100 From: Emmanuel Lecharny User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (X11/20050923) X-Accept-Language: fr, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Apache Directory Developers List Subject: [1.5.0 release] take 2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Hi, ok, the IP issues are gone, we don't any more depend on BouncyCastle jars, thanks to Enrique good work, so I guess we are ready for a new vote. However, as stated by David Jencks, it may be good to slightly change the process : 1) we tag this version (1.5.0-freeze, for instance) 2) we wait for a certain amount of time (let's say 72 hours) 3) if nobody as any objection, we launch a vote 4) 72 more hours to wait 5) no -1 ? we have a new ADS 1.5.0 release ! wdyt ?