directory-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Jim Yang" <jimy...@safehaus.org>
Subject Re: Rebuilding Apache
Date Fri, 16 Mar 2007 04:28:17 GMT
All,

I want to point out a testimonial about ApacheDS in my blog here.
Please feel free to link it to directory.apache.org's testimonial
section:

http://www.idtopia.com/blog/2006/10/12/apacheds-and-opends-folks-met/

Jim

On 3/15/07, Jim Yang <jimyang@safehaus.org> wrote:
> All,
>
> Penrose developers and contributors are well aware that Penrose
> leverages Apache DS in our architecture as our LDAP listener. In fact,
> it is listed in our FAQ (http://docs.safehaus.org/display/PENROSE/FAQ)
> for sometime now.
>
> With the upcoming release of Penrose 1.2, we are adding support for
> the other Open LDAP servers, such as OpenLDAP, OpenDS and Fedora DS.
>
> We, also, like to point out we don't use a straight GPL license to
> allow interoperability with the other open source license. Please read
> more here: http://docs.safehaus.org/display/PENROSE/FLOSS
>
> Cheers,
>
> Jim
>
> On 3/15/07, Alex Karasulu <akarasulu@apache.org> wrote:
> > Thanks for doing so.  Sounds like CA is working on a VD solution based on
> > ApacheDS much like Identyx (w/ Penrose) is working on one.  Would be good to
> > at least have some testimonials from both camps.  There's a lot of products
> > out there that use ApacheDS in one way or another.  It would be nice if more
> > of them revealed that.
> >
> > Alex
> >
> > On 3/15/07, Norval Hope <nrhope@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > I'm happy to assist as like AD and really appreciate having been able to
> > use it as a base in my day job. However, the degree to which I can
> > contribute is limitted by some factors:
> > >   1. I'm flat out busy at the moment on the releases of my day job project
> > >   2. My employer (CA) is very sensitive about the IP of our current
> > solution built on top of AD, and to avoid conflict of interest they've said
> > they don't mind me sharing broad-brush insights and findings but want me to
> > tread very carefully when it comes to coding and detailed design, especially
> > in areas outside of enhancing the AD core framework itself to make it more
> > VD friendly.
> > >
> > > Hence I may be of some use as a "domain consultant" (for whatever my
> > personal experience is worth) but less so as a major VD developer as such.
> > Just thought I should put my cards on the table and make the situation
> > clear.
> > >
> > > Cheers,
> > > Norval
> >
> >
>

Mime
View raw message