Return-Path: 
 <dev-return-15959-apmail-directory-dev-archive=directory.apache.org@directory.apache.org>
Delivered-To: apmail-directory-dev-archive@www.apache.org
Received: (qmail 63933 invoked from network); 14 Feb 2007 01:42:10 -0000
Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2)
  by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 14 Feb 2007 01:42:10 -0000
Received: (qmail 88716 invoked by uid 500); 14 Feb 2007 01:42:18 -0000
Delivered-To: apmail-directory-dev-archive@directory.apache.org
Received: (qmail 88669 invoked by uid 500); 14 Feb 2007 01:42:17 -0000
Mailing-List: contact dev-help@directory.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:dev-help@directory.apache.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:dev-unsubscribe@directory.apache.org>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@directory.apache.org>
List-Id: <dev.directory.apache.org>
Reply-To: "Apache Directory Developers List" <dev@directory.apache.org>
Delivered-To: mailing list dev@directory.apache.org
Received: (qmail 88658 invoked by uid 99); 14 Feb 2007 01:42:17 -0000
Received: from herse.apache.org (HELO herse.apache.org) (140.211.11.133)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 13 Feb 2007 17:42:17 -0800
X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.9 required=10.0
	tests=HTML_10_20,HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS
X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (herse.apache.org: domain of akarasulu@gmail.com designates
 64.233.182.184 as permitted sender)
Received: from [64.233.182.184] (HELO nf-out-0910.google.com) (64.233.182.184)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 13 Feb 2007 17:42:07 -0800
Received: by nf-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id o25so513598nfa
        for <dev@directory.apache.org>; Tue, 13 Feb 2007 17:41:46 -0800 (PST)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=beta;
        h=received:message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:x-google-sender-auth;
        b=J02fhPAchE5Mp5LYDiJU/1qPvwP3a9g3ePcpqpDFp9KYrNvstluZXULVsfO7zu8it6EuaVphxMx+E5HbcovLpkSAOLPgOlzt/lgiy5r5WflSbL3wCYN0XPsNGK711zok8hx2TOiVH4dKpHON2s7vkcsQ6hX8axR0vgblf43uMdw=
Received: by 10.49.107.8 with SMTP id j8mr1316238nfm.1171417306247;
        Tue, 13 Feb 2007 17:41:46 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.49.55.14 with HTTP; Tue, 13 Feb 2007 17:41:46 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <a32f6b020702131741qe670830tc81dec5db446d1da@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2007 20:41:46 -0500
From: "Alex Karasulu" <akarasulu@apache.org>
Sender: akarasulu@gmail.com
To: "Apache Directory Developers List" <dev@directory.apache.org>
Subject: [ApacheDS] Shall we upgrade to MINA 1.0.2 before releasing 1.0.1?
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
	boundary="----=_Part_38250_1235526.1171417306217"
X-Google-Sender-Auth: 9d51df2e6c17db36
X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org

------=_Part_38250_1235526.1171417306217
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

I think the MINA folks were going to release 1.0.2 shortly.  We can easily
upgrade to
MINA 1.0.1 for ApacheDS 1.0.1 now.  Should we wait until the MINA release?

Trustin, how close is the MINA team towards releasing 1.0.2?

Thanks,
Alex

------=_Part_38250_1235526.1171417306217
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

I think the MINA folks were going to release 1.0.2 shortly.&nbsp; We can easily upgrade to<br>MINA 1.0.1 for ApacheDS 1.0.1 now.&nbsp; Should we wait until the MINA release?<br><br>Trustin, how close is the MINA team towards releasing 
1.0.2?<br><br>Thanks,<br>Alex<br>

------=_Part_38250_1235526.1171417306217--