Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-directory-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 22794 invoked from network); 23 Feb 2007 20:26:34 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 23 Feb 2007 20:26:34 -0000 Received: (qmail 12248 invoked by uid 500); 23 Feb 2007 20:26:39 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-directory-dev-archive@directory.apache.org Received: (qmail 12219 invoked by uid 500); 23 Feb 2007 20:26:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@directory.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: "Apache Directory Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list dev@directory.apache.org Received: (qmail 12200 invoked by uid 99); 23 Feb 2007 20:26:39 -0000 Received: from herse.apache.org (HELO herse.apache.org) (140.211.11.133) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 23 Feb 2007 12:26:39 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (herse.apache.org: domain of mboorshtein@gmail.com designates 66.249.82.224 as permitted sender) Received: from [66.249.82.224] (HELO wx-out-0506.google.com) (66.249.82.224) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 23 Feb 2007 12:26:28 -0800 Received: by wx-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id h31so591299wxd for ; Fri, 23 Feb 2007 12:26:07 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=AWflTFuocuvJq2UMdjJsfoy2EXFaXLeNbWe+l3TtBPuIEBs9yQW+BXLWrAOBxn8OqGbTHRzSSWTkzHUy9YjjbUzazps7ytzlPBl3Ouo13kU92GjVLVdJdu7VMh3jNFCmrqAOEGnAce/m2IWPBjYxJYii2KWaBxagt85b4PeVQ4U= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=puwJj52v2SvpwYERj9oJt0Eq+EHMuM2hxdgknWciiNcDdWhR7GnpNw/UR4CnaLazbeBqmNgcv+xwaQR5XiHwxYP9IEHd+K5zgWRTVTR3HuDt9ZQ7CflAYNejNq6Y9nEke5Dc4KYHXVjZ7XSMa+n4GxgSeATVOIIQxDw6tXKexDE= Received: by 10.90.52.18 with SMTP id z18mr2572391agz.1172262366876; Fri, 23 Feb 2007 12:26:06 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.90.80.7 with HTTP; Fri, 23 Feb 2007 12:26:06 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <800df6390702231226mae2df75y4a2732d037f31f8@mail.gmail.com> Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2007 15:26:06 -0500 From: "Marc Boorshtein" To: dev@mina.apache.org, "Apache Directory Developers List" Subject: MINA 1.0.2 Scalability? MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org I was curious if any scalability testing has been done on MINA based servers and any scalability tips that may be available. I've already upped my SocketAcceptor threads which is not seeming to help. MyVD uses MINA for it's protocol stack (based on the apacheds stack). No matter what I do, I can't seem to go beyond 10 concurrent connections and was wondering if anyone else had seen this? Thanks Marc