From dev-return-15726-apmail-directory-dev-archive=directory.apache.org@directory.apache.org Tue Feb 06 17:44:14 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-directory-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 72644 invoked from network); 6 Feb 2007 17:44:13 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 6 Feb 2007 17:44:13 -0000 Received: (qmail 65961 invoked by uid 500); 6 Feb 2007 17:44:19 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-directory-dev-archive@directory.apache.org Received: (qmail 65931 invoked by uid 500); 6 Feb 2007 17:44:19 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@directory.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: "Apache Directory Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list dev@directory.apache.org Received: (qmail 65920 invoked by uid 99); 6 Feb 2007 17:44:19 -0000 Received: from herse.apache.org (HELO herse.apache.org) (140.211.11.133) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 06 Feb 2007 09:44:19 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.0 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (herse.apache.org: domain of pajbam@gmail.com designates 66.249.92.171 as permitted sender) Received: from [66.249.92.171] (HELO ug-out-1314.google.com) (66.249.92.171) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 06 Feb 2007 09:44:09 -0800 Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id o2so1592426uge for ; Tue, 06 Feb 2007 09:43:48 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references:x-google-sender-auth; b=fiXPWhHzQ4KU7w1/7LpIwqDVt8GAVxBaj5N74Ri0MRpkTN+SsxQ3DtHDwTpmP7O3zCRca3xgH5eLtjQlp9zcSGWMfd1Tqz0ZdH7h9VM393g6CtSvPMbzmtZofl2c+SRSamqk6A5CJb17xpN2yfiojHWas3qmvMxsx55O5CzZxMY= Received: by 10.78.171.13 with SMTP id t13mr257487hue.1170783825304; Tue, 06 Feb 2007 09:43:45 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.66.236.13 with HTTP; Tue, 6 Feb 2007 09:43:45 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <98d8c0860702060943y282dcf3cn3b5ad8832079548a@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 6 Feb 2007 18:43:45 +0100 From: "Pierre-Arnaud Marcelot" Sender: pajbam@gmail.com To: "Apache Directory Developers List" , akarasulu@apache.org Subject: Re: First LDAP Studio testing release ? In-Reply-To: <45C53052.6070707@apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_9351_14496643.1170783825100" References: <98d8c0860702010743t4a45938dl8b6a2b19bfb62a0f@mail.gmail.com> <45C2ADB7.5070504@apache.org> <98d8c0860702020949nc2842c6k2427820835c8f9@mail.gmail.com> <45C4DA35.5000306@apache.org> <45C4DF38.4060607@mvdb.net> <45C53052.6070707@apache.org> X-Google-Sender-Auth: 9b4c37de7c62aa11 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org ------=_Part_9351_14496643.1170783825100 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Hi Thanks Alex for the review. I fixed the LICENSE.txt and NOTICE.txt files in all projects and in the final distribution folder. All packages have been regenerated. There are still 4 packages : - LDAP_Studio_0.6.0_MacOSX.dmg - LDAP_Studio_0.6.0_linux_i386.tgz - LDAP_Studio_0.6.0_linux_ppc.tgz - LDAP_Studio_0.6.0_windows.exe They are still at the same url : http://people.apache.org/~pamarcelot/ldapstudio_0.6.0/ If the packages now meets requirements for a ASF release, maybe we can start a vote for the release ? Regards, Pierre-Arnaud On 2/4/07, Alex Karasulu wrote: > > Martin van den Bemt wrote: > >> (3) I see a jar here from IBM com.ibm.icu_3.4.5.jar that needs an > >> attribution. Also is the license ok for this. I have no clue what it > is. > > > > That's part of eclipse.. > > Ah OK thanks Martin. > > Regards, > Alex > > > ------=_Part_9351_14496643.1170783825100 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Hi

Thanks Alex for the review.

I fixed the LICENSE.txt and NOTICE.txt files in all projects and in the final distribution folder.

All packages have been regenerated. There are still 4 packages :
- LDAP_Studio_0.6.0_MacOSX.dmg
- LDAP_Studio_0.6.0_linux_i386.tgz
- LDAP_Studio_0.6.0_linux_ppc.tgz
- LDAP_Studio_0.6.0_windows.exe

They are still at the same url : http://people.apache.org/~pamarcelot/ldapstudio_0.6.0/

If the packages now meets requirements for a ASF release, maybe we can start a vote for the release ?

Regards,

Pierre-Arnaud



On 2/4/07, Alex Karasulu <akarasulu@apache.org> wrote:
Martin van den Bemt wrote:
>> (3) I see a jar here from IBM com.ibm.icu_3.4.5.jar that needs an
>> attribution.  Also is the license ok for this.  I have no clue what it is.
>
> That's part of eclipse..

Ah OK thanks Martin.

Regards,
Alex



------=_Part_9351_14496643.1170783825100--