Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-directory-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 43929 invoked from network); 10 Jan 2007 10:05:40 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 10 Jan 2007 10:05:40 -0000 Received: (qmail 58484 invoked by uid 500); 10 Jan 2007 10:05:46 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-directory-dev-archive@directory.apache.org Received: (qmail 58461 invoked by uid 500); 10 Jan 2007 10:05:46 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@directory.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: "Apache Directory Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list dev@directory.apache.org Received: (qmail 58450 invoked by uid 99); 10 Jan 2007 10:05:46 -0000 Received: from herse.apache.org (HELO herse.apache.org) (140.211.11.133) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 02:05:46 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.0 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (herse.apache.org: domain of elecharny@gmail.com designates 64.233.162.224 as permitted sender) Received: from [64.233.162.224] (HELO nz-out-0506.google.com) (64.233.162.224) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 02:05:37 -0800 Received: by nz-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id i28so41303nzi for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 02:05:17 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=gK0Z48VhZ7dSXSwkzo53N26UaF02c7WRuJXwwOWLLgLlVOdieWYFPqx+qd0rwQeF+Oh4fMps9srCwkFhl+DEo6sOrrj6h5RrhRRlVSJ18YMzMtNVh3mCdrKLlYEaFOM/sHegHxCXRU+L8lwIe2Td+A7mxn5smNWeoW15Rz9OJTg= Received: by 10.65.232.18 with SMTP id j18mr171621qbr.1168423517179; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 02:05:17 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.65.95.11 with HTTP; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 02:05:17 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 11:05:17 +0100 From: "Emmanuel Lecharny" Reply-To: elecharny@apache.org To: "Apache Directory Developers List" Subject: Re: Memory leak? In-Reply-To: <19C6EE85A12333D77090D146@SW-90-717-287-3.stanford.edu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_2166_16287486.1168423517099" References: <7598b87a0701082247h2c24eda7s48a41c6648eddd00@mail.gmail.com> <7598b87a0701092105t3c4edcbh327cd68809445f02@mail.gmail.com> <19C6EE85A12333D77090D146@SW-90-717-287-3.stanford.edu> X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org ------=_Part_2166_16287486.1168423517099 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline No, you can go with 1.0.0. Or you can checkout the current trunk. On 1/10/07, Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote: > > > > --On Wednesday, January 10, 2007 1:05 PM +0800 wolverine my > wrote: > > > > On 1/9/07, Emmanuel Lecharny wrote: > >> Hi, > >> > >> those slides are damn old now... We have fixed something like 50 bugs > >> since, (may be more), we have increase the performance of the server 3 > >> folds (900 req/s instead of 250 req/s) and we have also made some kind > >> of load test ( the server has been running for 72 h being requested at > >> the maximum requests rate : 900/s, more than 200 000 000 requests, > >> without a problem - except that my CPU was damn hot ! :) > >> > >> 1.0 has been released > >> (http://directory.apache.org/subprojects/apacheds/releases.html), > >> it has been certified by OpenGroup ( > >> http://www.opengroup.org/openbrand/register/brand3527.htm), > >> so I guess we are now on a much better shape than in june, 2006... > >> > >> Give 1.0 a try, but you also might wait for 1.0.1, expected to be out > >> within the next couple of week, because some very serious bugs will be > >> fixed in this coming version. > > So if someone wanted to benchmark ApacheDS, you would suggest waiting for > the 1.0.1 release? > > --Quanah > > > -- > Quanah Gibson-Mount > Principal Software Developer > ITS/Shared Application Services > Stanford University > GnuPG Public Key: http://www.stanford.edu/~quanah/pgp.html > --=20 Cordialement, Emmanuel L=E9charny www.iktek.com ------=_Part_2166_16287486.1168423517099 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline No, you can go with 1.0.0. Or you can checkout the current trunk.

On 1/10/07, Qu= anah Gibson-Mount <quanah@sta= nford.edu > wrote:


--On Wednesday, January 10, 2007 1:05 PM +0800 wolverine my <wolverine.my@gmail.com>= ; wrote:


> On 1/9/07, Emmanuel Lecharny <elecharny@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Hi, >>
>> those slides are damn old now... We have fixed somethi= ng like 50 bugs
>> since, (may be more), we have increase the perf= ormance of the server 3
>> folds (900 req/s instead of 250 req/s) = and we have also made some kind
>> of load test ( the server has been running for 72 h being requ= ested at
>> the maximum requests rate : 900/s, more than 200 000 0= 00 requests,
>> without a problem - except that my CPU was damn ho= t ! :)
>>
>> 1.0 has been released
>> (http://director= y.apache.org/subprojects/apacheds/releases.html),
>> it has be= en certified by OpenGroup (
>> http://www.opengroup.org/openbrand/register/brand3527.htm),
= >> so I guess we are now on a much better shape than in june, 2006...
>>
>> Give 1.0 a try, but you also might wait for 1.0.1,= expected to be out
>> within the next couple of week, because som= e very serious bugs will be
>> fixed in this coming version.

So if someone wanted to benchmark ApacheDS, you would suggest waiting f= or
the 1.0.1 release?

--Quanah


--
Quanah Gibson-Mou= nt
Principal Software Developer
ITS/Shared Application Services
Stanford University
GnuPG Public Key: http://www.stanford.edu/~quanah/pgp.html



--
Cordialement,
Emmanuel L=E9c= harny
www.iktek.com ------=_Part_2166_16287486.1168423517099--