Mailing-List: contact dev-help@directory.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: "Apache Directory Developers List" <dev@directory.apache.org>
Received-SPF: pass (herse.apache.org: domain of wolverine.my@gmail.com
 designates 66.249.82.226 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
        s=beta; d=gmail.com;
        h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references;
        b=Bya9zJ5VUmS6A0x3jIDhVLYG1VxSLblCL/5Fh7m1328kor3RWwwxkssikniKQmA7u/uE8QT9dRsoCb4t+kHpRdPOcnoqdOlUjATKxEivGKQ1S4NsrtnzzHdJ/FKsTrA1k4V1MnXFAS9ic8X2Qnbr16Ewy3T614PAky8iUXjMM6k=
Message-ID: <7598b87a0701092105t3c4edcbh327cd68809445f02@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 13:05:55 +0800
From: "wolverine my" <wolverine.my@gmail.com>
To: "Apache Directory Developers List" <dev@directory.apache.org>,
	elecharny@apache.org
Subject: Re: Memory leak?
In-Reply-To: <d45b08f00701090230j75b54732k95af7075bccf4087@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <7598b87a0701082247h2c24eda7s48a41c6648eddd00@mail.gmail.com>
	 <d45b08f00701090230j75b54732k95af7075bccf4087@mail.gmail.com>

OK, thanks for the quick response!

I think it would be very useful to put up the performance benchmark in
ApacheDS homepage.


On 1/9/07, Emmanuel Lecharny <elecharny@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> those slides are damn old now... We have fixed somthing like 50 bugs sinc=
e,
> (may be more), we have increase the performance of the server 3 folds (90=
0
> req/s instead of 250 req/s) and we have also made some kind of load test =
(
> the server has been running for 72 h being requested at the maximum reque=
sts
> rate : 900/s, more than 200 000 000 requests, without a problem - except
> that my CPU was damn hot ! :)
>
> 1.0 has been released
> (http://directory.apache.org/subprojects/apacheds/releases.html),
> it has been certified by OpenGroup (
> http://www.opengroup.org/openbrand/register/brand3527.htm),
> so I guess we are now on a much better shape than in june, 2006...
>
> Give 1.0 a try, but you also might wait for 1.0.1, expected to be out wit=
hin
> the next couple of week, because some very serious bugs will be fixed in
> this coming version.
>
> So, regarding MemoryLeaks, I will say that, yes, we have found and fixed =
the
> most visible ones. But as stated in any M$ software licence : "...IN NO
> EVENT SHALL xxxxx OR ITS SUPPLIERS BE LIABLE FOR ANY SPECIAL, INCIDENTAL,
> INDIRECT, OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES WHATSOEVER..."
>
> Have fun with ADS !
>
> Emmanuel
>
>
> On 1/9/07, wolverine my < wolverine.my@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Hi!
> >
> > Emmanuel Lecharny mentioned in his ApacheCon Europe 06's presentation
> > slides that ApacheDS has a lot of bus to be fixed, and that including
> > memory leaks!
> >
> > May I know if the memory leaks has been fixed?
> > Or this is still a on-going issue?
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Cordialement,
> Emmanuel L=E9charny
> www.iktek.com