Return-Path: 
 <dev-return-13858-apmail-directory-dev-archive=directory.apache.org@directory.apache.org>
Delivered-To: apmail-directory-dev-archive@www.apache.org
Received: (qmail 92202 invoked from network); 13 Oct 2006 03:12:52 -0000
Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199)
  by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 13 Oct 2006 03:12:52 -0000
Received: (qmail 31254 invoked by uid 500); 13 Oct 2006 03:12:51 -0000
Delivered-To: apmail-directory-dev-archive@directory.apache.org
Received: (qmail 31218 invoked by uid 500); 13 Oct 2006 03:12:50 -0000
Mailing-List: contact dev-help@directory.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:dev-help@directory.apache.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:dev-unsubscribe@directory.apache.org>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@directory.apache.org>
List-Id: <dev.directory.apache.org>
Reply-To: "Apache Directory Developers List" <dev@directory.apache.org>
Delivered-To: mailing list dev@directory.apache.org
Received: (qmail 31207 invoked by uid 99); 13 Oct 2006 03:12:50 -0000
Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (140.211.166.49)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 12 Oct 2006 20:12:50 -0700
X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.5 required=10.0
	tests=DNS_FROM_RFC_ABUSE,HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS
X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: domain of trustin@gmail.com designates
 64.233.166.178 as permitted sender)
Received: from [64.233.166.178] (HELO py-out-1112.google.com) (64.233.166.178)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 12 Oct 2006 20:12:49 -0700
Received: by py-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id d80so927210pyd
        for <dev@directory.apache.org>; Thu, 12 Oct 2006 20:12:29 -0700 (PDT)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
        s=beta; d=gmail.com;
        h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references;
        b=FuunPrbWyAQz43ZQvXatb8JMuiYa43XCHfItNR112lzIQjD2BSsp1ISqzLEVWeHCq6TazFd+IIvsfNArhKtYU+mO6lYZK/pkMz8tTc2VSPLJsIUM/fBhyxZzsytGPZxWoq2gnuiRTBmiz2Ci1dLUh2CYtwNHH9qk7yJ+hkyNjI0=
Received: by 10.35.98.6 with SMTP id a6mr4655814pym;
        Thu, 12 Oct 2006 20:12:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.35.68.13 with HTTP; Thu, 12 Oct 2006 20:12:28 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <768dcb2e0610122012x675d68ctd49d1a36259d25ed@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 13 Oct 2006 12:12:28 +0900
From: "Trustin Lee" <trustin@gmail.com>
To: "Apache Directory Developers List" <dev@directory.apache.org>
Subject: Re: [VOTE] java 5 ?
In-Reply-To: <45a054f50610121754g35681112h2ae9efbb8c14abda@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
	boundary="----=_Part_31559_13957384.1160709148485"
References: <d45b08f00610121149j6d6ab3d9x41425e8d574c745f@mail.gmail.com>
	 <45a054f50610121754g35681112h2ae9efbb8c14abda@mail.gmail.com>
X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org
X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N

------=_Part_31559_13957384.1160709148485
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

On 10/13/06, Mike Heath <mheath@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > [X] 1.1, 1.2 ... should remain 1.4 compatible. However, let's create a
> 1.5
> > branch for java 5
>
> I like the idea of releasing a Java 5 implementation of MINA and
> calling it version 1.5.  I don't think it makes a lot of sense to
> develop something as 1.1 and then turn around and release it as 1.5.


This vote is for ApacheDS, instead of MINA.  We will talk about MINA
versioning scheme later.  I'm forging one, so please stay tuned. :)

Trustin
-- 
what we call human nature is actually human habit
--
http://gleamynode.net/
--
PGP key fingerprints:
* E167 E6AF E73A CBCE EE41  4A29 544D DE48 FE95 4E7E
* B693 628E 6047 4F8F CFA4  455E 1C62 A7DC 0255 ECA6

------=_Part_31559_13957384.1160709148485
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

<div><span class="gmail_quote">On 10/13/06, <b class="gmail_sendername">Mike Heath</b> &lt;<a href="mailto:mheath@apache.org">mheath@apache.org</a>&gt; wrote:</span><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
&gt; [X] 1.1, 1.2 ... should remain 1.4 compatible. However, let's create a 1.5<br>&gt; branch for java 5<br><br>I like the idea of releasing a Java 5 implementation of MINA and<br>calling it version 1.5.&nbsp;&nbsp;I don't think it makes a lot of sense to
<br>develop something as 1.1 and then turn around and release it as 1.5.</blockquote><div><br>This vote is for ApacheDS, instead of MINA.&nbsp; We will talk about MINA versioning scheme later.&nbsp; I'm forging one, so please stay tuned. :)
<br><br>Trustin<br></div></div>-- <br>what we call human nature is actually human habit<br>--<br><a href="http://gleamynode.net/">http://gleamynode.net/</a><br>--<br>PGP key fingerprints:<br>* E167 E6AF E73A CBCE EE41&nbsp;&nbsp;4A29 544D DE48 FE95 4E7E
<br>* B693 628E 6047 4F8F CFA4&nbsp;&nbsp;455E 1C62 A7DC 0255 ECA6

------=_Part_31559_13957384.1160709148485--