Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-directory-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 77473 invoked from network); 4 Sep 2006 13:53:37 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 4 Sep 2006 13:53:37 -0000 Received: (qmail 91464 invoked by uid 500); 4 Sep 2006 13:53:37 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-directory-dev-archive@directory.apache.org Received: (qmail 91234 invoked by uid 500); 4 Sep 2006 13:53:36 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@directory.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: "Apache Directory Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list dev@directory.apache.org Received: (qmail 91223 invoked by uid 99); 4 Sep 2006 13:53:36 -0000 Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (140.211.166.49) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 04 Sep 2006 06:53:36 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.5 required=10.0 tests=DNS_FROM_RFC_ABUSE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: domain of ersin.er@gmail.com designates 64.233.166.176 as permitted sender) Received: from [64.233.166.176] (HELO py-out-1112.google.com) (64.233.166.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 04 Sep 2006 06:53:35 -0700 Received: by py-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id d80so2650503pyd for ; Mon, 04 Sep 2006 06:53:14 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=uU3V9N9s2FUT1ZLEeMED2z5CW51SbZbw4Se6/kSSnbDpFoOZnWEI9p6ZF7hOk2QcNpmpQASO9uTXVLkkXJu+ineQovQ5gCXwrexqidbom08DIhZKReRC6M+at7JYzR6Fajvs5X562TzPOREX4QxVlBUgFvIKW/hsbpqnn836d2c= Received: by 10.35.106.1 with SMTP id i1mr10208335pym; Mon, 04 Sep 2006 06:53:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.35.134.4 with HTTP; Mon, 4 Sep 2006 06:53:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Mon, 4 Sep 2006 16:53:14 +0300 From: "Ersin Er" To: "Apache Directory Developers List" Subject: Build failure due to recent MINA updates and which version of MINA to use MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Hi, Currenly, trunks does not build due to some interface changes in MINA. 1.1 services use MINA 0.9.5-SNAPSHOT, so they are all affected. However 1.0 services use MINA 0.9.4 and so they are not affected and 1.0-trunks builds fine. So two things to consider: 1. We need to fix 1.1-trunk build problem. (We'll only add some empty methods to some classes as Trustin suggested.) .2 Shall we use MINA 0.9.5{-SNAPSHOT} for 1.0 branch? Cheers, -- Ersin