directory-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Ersin Er" <ersin...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [ADS 2.0] discussions
Date Mon, 04 Sep 2006 06:26:48 GMT
Hi,

On 9/4/06, Trustin Lee <trustin@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Emmanuel,
>
>
> On 9/4/06, Emmanuel Lecharny <elecharny@iktek.com> wrote:
> > Hi gang,
> >
> > we have started some discussion relative to ADS 2.0 on the ML, and it
> > could be good to be able to distinguish this thread from the other ones.
> >
> > I suggest that we start all mails relative to ADS 2.0 by [ADS 2.0]
> >
> > btw, this ADS-2.0 is not scheduled for a close future, let's say it's
> > myuch more an experimental zone where we put some ideas we can't
> > implement in 1.0 - but that we may put in 1.1 or 1.2 ...)
>
>
> I don't think we can't experiment with 1.1 or any further releases.  I
> thought we are rewriting ApacheDS completely from the number 2.0.
>
> What we really need to do is to extract important design issues of ApacheDS
> from a various level (API, architecture, ...) and resolve them one by one in
> decending order of the impact.  I think this effort should make what 1.1 is.
>  Yep, as we discussed long before, 1.1 is a unstable branch.  So basically
> we shouldn't have any limitation on changing anything critical.  Resolving a
> big design issue which causes a lot of refactoring and rewriting should be
> done as earliest as possible in a unstable branch.

IMO, 1.1 branch still seems to be a "lesson" taking branch. It's main
purpose is testing very new features. And with all those lessons, 2.0
can be written from scratch.

> Trustin
> --
> what we call human nature is actually human habit
> --
> http://gleamynode.net/
> --
> PGP key fingerprints:
> * E167 E6AF E73A CBCE EE41  4A29 544D DE48 FE95 4E7E
> * B693 628E 6047 4F8F CFA4  455E 1C62 A7DC 0255 ECA6


-- 
Ersin

Mime
View raw message