directory-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Alex Karasulu <aok...@bellsouth.net>
Subject Re: [ADS 2.0] discussions
Date Mon, 04 Sep 2006 19:30:06 GMT
Trustin Lee wrote:
> Hi Emmanuel,
> 
> On 9/4/06, *Emmanuel Lecharny* <elecharny@iktek.com 
> <mailto:elecharny@iktek.com>> wrote:
> 
>     Hi gang,
> 
>     we have started some discussion relative to ADS 2.0 on the ML, and it
>     could be good to be able to distinguish this thread from the other ones.
> 
>     I suggest that we start all mails relative to ADS 2.0 by [ADS 2.0]
> 
>     btw, this ADS-2.0 is not scheduled for a close future, let's say it's
>     myuch more an experimental zone where we put some ideas we can't
>     implement in 1.0 - but that we may put in 1.1 or 1.2 ...)
> 
> 
> I don't think we can't experiment with 1.1 or any further releases.  I 
> thought we are rewriting ApacheDS completely from the number 2.0.

Right 2.0 is rewrite with 1.5 jdk while 1.1, 1.2 ... is not and still 
uses jdk 1.4.

> What we really need to do is to extract important design issues of 
> ApacheDS from a various level (API, architecture, ...) and resolve them 
> one by one in decending order of the impact.  

I agree with you 100%.

I think this effort should
> make what 1.1 is. 

+1 here too.

  Yep, as we discussed long before, 1.1 is a unstable
> branch.  So basically we shouldn't have any limitation on changing 
> anything critical.  

Exactly.

Resolving a big design issue which causes a lot of
> refactoring and rewriting should be done as earliest as possible in a 
> unstable branch.
> 

I cannot agree with you more.

Alex

Mime
View raw message