Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-directory-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 82529 invoked from network); 22 Aug 2006 12:25:58 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 22 Aug 2006 12:25:58 -0000 Received: (qmail 93101 invoked by uid 500); 22 Aug 2006 12:25:58 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-directory-dev-archive@directory.apache.org Received: (qmail 93057 invoked by uid 500); 22 Aug 2006 12:25:57 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@directory.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: "Apache Directory Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list dev@directory.apache.org Received: (qmail 93046 invoked by uid 99); 22 Aug 2006 12:25:57 -0000 Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (140.211.166.49) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 22 Aug 2006 05:25:57 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: domain of j.henne@levigo.de designates 62.206.214.5 as permitted sender) Received: from [62.206.214.5] (HELO mail.levigo.de) (62.206.214.5) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 22 Aug 2006 05:25:57 -0700 Received: from ASSP-nospam (mail.levigo.de [127.0.0.1]) by mail.levigo.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 35F9E7EEA for ; Tue, 22 Aug 2006 14:25:34 +0200 (CEST) Received: from 10.208.3.42 ([10.208.3.42] helo=[10.208.3.42]) by ASSP-nospam ; 22 Aug 06 12:25:34 -0000 Message-ID: <44EAF7BD.5060400@levigo.de> Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2006 14:25:33 +0200 From: =?ISO-8859-15?Q?J=F6rg_Henne?= User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.5 (Windows/20060719) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Apache Directory Developers List Subject: MINA 0.9.5 for DS 1.0-RC4? Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAA== X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Hi, since the DHCP stuff hinges on features added in MINA 0.9.5 I would love to see RC4 being compiled against MINA 0.9.5 instead of 0.9.4. What do you think - is there anything that keeps us from switching? Joerg Henne