Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-directory-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 7182 invoked from network); 17 Jul 2006 13:45:50 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 17 Jul 2006 13:45:50 -0000 Received: (qmail 68482 invoked by uid 500); 17 Jul 2006 13:45:49 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-directory-dev-archive@directory.apache.org Received: (qmail 68450 invoked by uid 500); 17 Jul 2006 13:45:49 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@directory.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: "Apache Directory Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list dev@directory.apache.org Received: (qmail 68433 invoked by uid 99); 17 Jul 2006 13:45:49 -0000 Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (140.211.166.49) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 17 Jul 2006 06:45:49 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.9 required=10.0 tests=DNS_FROM_RFC_ABUSE,DNS_FROM_RFC_POST,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: domain of aok123@bellsouth.net designates 205.152.59.69 as permitted sender) Received: from [205.152.59.69] (HELO imf21aec.mail.bellsouth.net) (205.152.59.69) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 17 Jul 2006 06:45:48 -0700 Received: from ibm63aec.bellsouth.net ([65.80.200.112]) by imf21aec.mail.bellsouth.net with ESMTP id <20060717134527.IZJD29313.imf21aec.mail.bellsouth.net@ibm63aec.bellsouth.net> for ; Mon, 17 Jul 2006 09:45:27 -0400 Received: from [172.16.1.7] (really [65.80.200.112]) by ibm63aec.bellsouth.net with ESMTP id <20060717134527.LIWE1324.ibm63aec.bellsouth.net@[172.16.1.7]> for ; Mon, 17 Jul 2006 09:45:27 -0400 Message-ID: <44BB94AD.5000206@bellsouth.net> Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2006 09:46:21 -0400 From: Alex Karasulu User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.4 (X11/20060615) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Apache Directory Developers List Subject: Re: [ApacheDS] Doing away with JNDI interface References: <44BB84F1.9050107@bellsouth.net> <44BB8FA3.2010504@levigo.de> In-Reply-To: <44BB8FA3.2010504@levigo.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N J�rg Henne wrote: > Alex Karasulu schrieb: >> The attempt to make JNDI the default interface for embedding the server >> is costing too much in overhead and complexity. I would like the 1.1 >> branch to make the core use a non-JNDI based interfaces as the primary >> means to embed ApacheDS. > what would be the target audience of this non-JNDI interface? The DHCP > server? The DNS server? If yes, I have some objections, mainly centered > around interoperability issues. With the current model, the DHCP server > could talk to a non DS direcrory implementation. Once those two are tied > together using a non-JNDI interface, this option is basically lost, or > has to be resurrected by wrapping JNDI. > Exactly! We'll use a wrapper so people will not loose out. Hope this ameliorates your fears. Alex