directory-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Ceki Gülcü <lis...@qos.ch>
Subject Separating API and binding
Date Sun, 16 Jul 2006 13:41:19 GMT

Hello all,

It has been observes that while SLF4J offers abstraction of for
various logging systems through compile-time bindings, it bundles the
SLF4J API and a particular binding in a single jar file. Thus, we
currently have:

slf4j-nop.jar
slf4j-simple.jar
slf4j-jdk14.jar
slf4j-jul.jar

each of which contains a copy of SLF4J API and a corresponding binding.

I think it would be somewhat cleaner to separate the API in its own
jar file. Thus, we would have

slf4j-api.jar (just the API with no particular binding)

slf4j-nop.jar    (only the nop binding, no API)
slf4j-simple.jar (only the simple binding, no API)
slf4j-jdk14.jar (only the jdk14 binding, no API)
slf4j-jul.jar (only the jul binding, no API)

The only down side to this approach is that the user would need to
deploy two jar files instead of one. The upside is a clearer
separation between API and implementation.

Is there any opposition to this approach?

Your comments are most welcome.



-- 
Ceki Gülcü
http://ceki.blogspot.com/


Mime
View raw message