directory-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From peter royal <>
Subject Re: svn commit: r385254 - in /directory/trunks/mina/core/src/main/java/org/apache/mina/filter/codec: demux/ demux/ demux/MessageEncoderFacto
Date Mon, 13 Mar 2006 02:40:14 GMT
On Mar 12, 2006, at 9:25 PM, Trustin Lee wrote:
> Because of datagram transport and pluggable thread pool, we have to  
> retain the synchronization.  Datagram doesn't become a problem if  
> DIRMINA-162 ( ) is  
> resolved.  WRT non-leader-followers thread pool, it apparently is a  
> problem.
> The question would be 'do we really need pluggable thread pool?' or  
> 'does an ordinary thread pool outperform a leader-followers thread  
> pool seriously?'  Robert told us an ordinary TP performs 25% better  
> than a LFTP, but it might be just because encoding is not pooled.

Is it really specific to the type of thread pool? I attached a  
pluggable implementation to 
DIRMINA-184 , and retained the ordering of events while using a  

-- -

View raw message