Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-directory-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 54847 invoked from network); 19 Jan 2006 11:06:38 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 19 Jan 2006 11:06:38 -0000 Received: (qmail 74187 invoked by uid 500); 19 Jan 2006 11:06:06 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-directory-dev-archive@directory.apache.org Received: (qmail 74123 invoked by uid 500); 19 Jan 2006 11:06:05 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@directory.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: "Apache Directory Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list dev@directory.apache.org Received: (qmail 74109 invoked by uid 99); 19 Jan 2006 11:06:05 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [192.87.106.226] (HELO ajax.apache.org) (192.87.106.226) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 19 Jan 2006 03:06:03 -0800 Received: from ajax.apache.org (ajax.apache.org [127.0.0.1]) by ajax.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D6D50E0 for ; Thu, 19 Jan 2006 12:05:42 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <1820075678.1137668742877.JavaMail.jira@ajax.apache.org> Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2006 12:05:42 +0100 (CET) From: "Rainer Bieniek (JIRA)" To: dev@directory.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (DIRMINA-162) datagram session management fails In-Reply-To: <841723789.1136933781031.JavaMail.jira@ajax.apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N [ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRMINA-162?page=comments#action_12363234 ] Rainer Bieniek commented on DIRMINA-162: ---------------------------------------- I already approached this but I found out that it will not work without a acceptor facade which encapsulates the "real" datagram acceptor and does the session tarcking on behalf of the client. This thing is in fact second-next on my to-do list for my current project. Once this facade works, it can easily implement the proposed tracker interface. If it works, I will supply my implementation as a diff to mina-0.9.0 > datagram session management fails > --------------------------------- > > Key: DIRMINA-162 > URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRMINA-162 > Project: Directory MINA > Type: Bug > Versions: 0.9 > Reporter: Rainer Bieniek > Priority: Minor > > As of mina 0.9.0 the session management does not work in various ways: > - a new session is created per received package. The worker thread does not cache created session but only assign the select key to the session and drops it after processing the package. It would be better to attach the session to the RegistrationRequest and check it while processing the received package. > - the provided IoFilterChainBuilder does get applied to the created datagram session. It is cached in the RegistrationRequest but not used on the session > - The sessionClose lifecycle event is not applied on the session either. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira