directory-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Brett Porter <>
Subject Re: Shall we move this into new structure?
Date Sun, 08 Jan 2006 19:50:42 GMT
It really depends on what Tomcat says. If they want to use the code,
that's great. If they want to take patches such that we can update to
make it a dependency, that's fine too. If they don't respond at all
again, it doesn't give me a lot of hope that patches will be applied
in a timely manner either - but that's an entirely different problem

I still think it is very useful and could be a lot better (for
instance, not silently swallowing important exceptions, IIRC).
However, I'm not using it anymore, and unless I find an excuse to I'm
unlikely to have a lot of time to do anything with it unfortunately.

I don't think it should be archived - if it ends up that it stays here
then it would be good to give it a scrub and 1.0 release and see if
anyone picks up on it. It is useful, so there's a good chance of that.

- Brett

On 1/8/06, Phil Steitz <> wrote:
> Sorry - I have been having some "technical difficulties" this week.
> I am still on the fence re jar dependency on tomcat naming,
> maintaining the full source or letting it go dormant.  I am still
> interested in others' ideas on this.  I am willing to do the work to
> refactor for the first option and move to m2, but would also happlily
> review and apply patches from others who may be interested in getting
> involved in [naming].  If there is no community or user interest in
> pushing forward, I am also happy to archive and move on to other
> things...
> Phil
> On 1/7/06, Brett Porter <> wrote:
> > It's structure is already as desired multiproject wise. Since it has a
> > separate release cycle, I think its best to keep it under a separate
> > trunk.
> >
> > Phil made a couple of nice extensions to the build like aggregated
> > javadoc that we haven't done for the m2 javadoc plugin yet. Might need
> > to get those in order before converting.
> >
> > Either way, we really need to find out where it is going with regards
> > to the discussion the other day before doing anything.
> >
> > - Brett
> >
> > On 1/8/06, Alex Karasulu <> wrote:
> > > Anyone going to maven2ify it? I can move it into the new structure if
> > > you guys like?
> > >
> > > Alex
> > >
> >

View raw message