Mailing-List: contact dev-help@directory.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: "Apache Directory Developers List" <dev@directory.apache.org>
Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: domain of mboorshtein@gmail.com designates
 64.233.184.205 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
        s=beta; d=gmail.com;
        h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references;
        b=Dku8/umszG0sUl2YNGQ+yoP1wzU3dJU6HHLxJcj9+NmVGHl6t+5q0c3J2y+RDu0e/eoDn9Cbr8ZznGpfmzZTim820HAfCUCNs+a9T7o6eNcsvn7vMqgqMjInPkY4JI6EZ/w+7WX7dugBS4y9D/L4G0mto2shm76/Dzj8yYatK3k=
Message-ID: <800df6390512120414n373b7918ie9114007b7e499d0@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2005 07:14:35 -0500
From: Marc Boorshtein <mboorshtein@gmail.com>
To: Apache Directory Developers List <dev@directory.apache.org>
Subject: Re: [ApacheDS][SP] Stored Procedure Languages
In-Reply-To: <a1b4a6610512120410m30a6e51fuabf020e78d983a87@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <a1b4a6610512100422l584ed665t6db19843e7f6ca28@mail.gmail.com>
	 <1134224497.7846.166.camel@portable>
	 <a1b4a6610512100626p589c380er8167df5e37da4d27@mail.gmail.com>
	 <800df6390512101129p5d786618s214c855ad229d51d@mail.gmail.com>
	 <a1b4a6610512101355v389165f0i71ec31d9a82f9e38@mail.gmail.com>
	 <1134376797.4013.1.camel@localhost.localdomain>
	 <a1b4a6610512120047t443cd9b7n13d9be84170bb5a6@mail.gmail.com>
	 <768dcb2e0512120116y64cef39cq@mail.gmail.com>
	 <800df6390512120338w4cdfd59axdb2f4ec47c122831@mail.gmail.com>
	 <a1b4a6610512120410m30a6e51fuabf020e78d983a87@mail.gmail.com>

Sorry, should have said "Stored Procedure" or script.  Will the
scripts be executed by a particuler operation (ie an add is executed
which executes a script) or will it be executed manually by some
external mechanism?

Marc

On 12/12/05, Ersin Er <ersin.er@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 12/12/05, Marc Boorshtein <mboorshtein@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Performance will probably be an issue with almost any scripting
> > language that provides some more dynamic capabilities then java.
>
> Of course. Just trying to choose a reasoable one.
>
> > Also, what are you planning to use as the mapping model?  For
> > instance, will it be a single method for eac operation or a method for
> > the input and one for the output?
>
> I'm not sure I exactly understand what you mean by mapping here. We
> have DIT based Java classes whose only one static method can be called
> as a stored procedure at a time. For scripting languages we may force
> the script (again in the DIT) to have a function/method with certain
> name (in case we cannot use reflection here) or we may use the script
> as a whole. And for parameters we'll always use Java objects (and
> primitives) and we will wrap them with any method required by the
> scripting language and put in a context (as required by the scripting
> language) to be passed to the script.
>
> > Marc
> >
> > On 12/12/05, Trustin Lee <trustin@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > 2005/12/12, Ersin Er <ersin.er@gmail.com>:
> > > > Hmm, OK. BeanShell seemed to be well integrated with Java but
> > > > performance is an important aspect of our choice. We many consider
> > > > using Mozilla Rhino.
> > >
> > > Rhino is a JavaScript engine with great performance and ease of use, =
but
> > > there's an issue with its license IIRC.  There was a discussion on Rh=
ino in
> > > legal-discuss@apache.org, but this issue was not closed because nobod=
y gave
> > > the bottom line.  I don't think it is because this issue is resolved;=
 I've
> > > been reading legal-discuss list since it had started.
> > >
> > > If license becomes a problem, we could just use Groovy, which is more
> > > attractive option for Java developers.
> > >
> > > HTH,
> > > Trustin
> > > --
> > > what we call human nature is actually human habit
> > > --
> > >  http://gleamynode.net/
> >
>
>
> --
> Ersin
>