Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-directory-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 67124 invoked from network); 9 Dec 2005 15:26:44 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 9 Dec 2005 15:26:44 -0000 Received: (qmail 61986 invoked by uid 500); 9 Dec 2005 15:26:39 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-directory-dev-archive@directory.apache.org Received: (qmail 61863 invoked by uid 500); 9 Dec 2005 15:26:38 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@directory.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: "Apache Directory Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list dev@directory.apache.org Received: (qmail 61830 invoked by uid 99); 9 Dec 2005 15:26:38 -0000 Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (140.211.166.49) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 09 Dec 2005 07:26:37 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: local policy) Received: from [195.253.2.54] (HELO hp9000.do.knipp.de) (195.253.2.54) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 09 Dec 2005 07:26:36 -0800 Received: from [195.253.2.11] (seth.do.knipp.de [195.253.2.11]) by hp9000.do.knipp.de (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id jB9FQEq22290 for ; Fri, 9 Dec 2005 16:26:14 +0100 (MET) Message-ID: <4399A1E9.3050205@knipp.de> Date: Fri, 09 Dec 2005 16:25:29 +0100 From: Thomas Corte Organization: Knipp Medien und Kommunikation User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (Windows/20050923) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: dev@directory.apache.org Subject: [MINA] which MINA version? Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Hello, from the versioning remarks on the MINA web pages and FAQ, I understand that 0.8.1 is the most recent stable release, while 0.9 is still considered unstable, while adding lots of features and an API change regarding 0.8.x. So what should I use for a new MINA based project that requires a somewhat stable framework? Usually 0.8 of course, but could this mean that I'd have to do a lot of API adaptations if I wanted to switch to newer version of MINA later? And if yes, is the amount of instability that's coming with 0.9 acceptable? Any advice would be appreciated. Regards, -- Thomas