Mailing-List: contact dev-help@directory.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: "Apache Directory Developers List" <dev@directory.apache.org>
Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: local policy)
Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2005 11:09:09 +0100
From: Jeremias Maerki <dev@jeremias-maerki.ch>
To: Trustin Lee <trustin@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [ApacheDS][SP] Stored Procedure Languages
Cc: Apache Directory Developers List <dev@directory.apache.org>,
        Legal Discuss <legal-discuss@apache.org>
In-Reply-To: <768dcb2e0512120116y64cef39cq@mail.gmail.com>
References: <a1b4a6610512120047t443cd9b7n13d9be84170bb5a6@mail.gmail.com>
 <768dcb2e0512120116y64cef39cq@mail.gmail.com>
Message-Id: <20051212110835.A814.DEV@jeremias-maerki.ch>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

See:
http://www.apache.org/foundation/records/minutes/2005/board_minutes_2005_08_17.txt
(Special Orders 6.B.)

The board has indirectly approved the use of Rhino through the
resolution found through the link above. Be sure to follow the
instructions contained in the resolution.

On 12.12.2005 10:16:52 Trustin Lee wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> 2005/12/12, Ersin Er <ersin.er@gmail.com>:
> >
> > Hmm, OK. BeanShell seemed to be well integrated with Java but
> > performance is an important aspect of our choice. We many consider
> > using Mozilla Rhino.
> 
> 
> Rhino is a JavaScript engine with great performance and ease of use, but
> there's an issue with its license IIRC.  There was a discussion on Rhino in
> legal-discuss@apache.org, but this issue was not closed because nobody gave
> the bottom line.  I don't think it is because this issue is resolved; I've
> been reading legal-discuss list since it had started.
> 
> If license becomes a problem, we could just use Groovy, which is more
> attractive option for Java developers.
> 
> HTH,
> Trustin
> --
> what we call human nature is actually human habit
> --
> http://gleamynode.net/


Jeremias Maerki