From dev-return-9701-apmail-directory-dev-archive=directory.apache.org@directory.apache.org Mon Dec 05 08:30:54 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-directory-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 87358 invoked from network); 5 Dec 2005 08:30:54 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 5 Dec 2005 08:30:54 -0000 Received: (qmail 49231 invoked by uid 500); 5 Dec 2005 08:30:53 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-directory-dev-archive@directory.apache.org Received: (qmail 48988 invoked by uid 500); 5 Dec 2005 08:30:52 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@directory.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: "Apache Directory Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list dev@directory.apache.org Received: (qmail 48972 invoked by uid 99); 5 Dec 2005 08:30:52 -0000 Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (140.211.166.49) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 05 Dec 2005 00:30:52 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: domain of elecharny@gmail.com designates 64.233.162.206 as permitted sender) Received: from [64.233.162.206] (HELO zproxy.gmail.com) (64.233.162.206) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 05 Dec 2005 00:30:51 -0800 Received: by zproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id o1so660187nzf for ; Mon, 05 Dec 2005 00:30:31 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:subject:from:to:in-reply-to:references:content-type:date:message-id:mime-version:x-mailer:content-transfer-encoding; b=YlickZLAh2HgcLxYZpGxYUbMDBYzFTBzjjUnUScJKSBzT8XxPAFOqLuL5HVU+budNc29YbNNXszhINIXRHVtLQaohfT81ujVFvyAdoy3C9ittu7KhslYV5Dg+D/VoT76uUJZmtg/68wouUMCoCl9mL+YqaWjgxnDNaZ/iP4XRsY= Received: by 10.65.81.20 with SMTP id i20mr2544583qbl; Mon, 05 Dec 2005 00:30:30 -0800 (PST) Received: from ?192.168.0.2? ( [82.66.216.176]) by mx.gmail.com with ESMTP id q15sm1403053qbq.2005.12.05.00.30.26; Mon, 05 Dec 2005 00:30:27 -0800 (PST) Subject: Re: Adding unit tests attached to bug reports to the code base From: Emmanuel Lecharny To: Apache Directory Developers List In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain Date: Mon, 05 Dec 2005 09:30:35 +0100 Message-Id: <1133771435.7846.51.camel@portable> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.2.1.1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N On Mon, 2005-12-05 at 10:15 +0200, Ersin Er wrote: > Hi all, > > I think it would be better if we add unit tests attached to Jira > issues to our code base to prevent bug recurrence in future releases. > (Of course I'm preassuming that we attach unit tests Jira issues we > report.) I bet that each bug has its Junit test attached, at least for simple tests ! In any case, if we have a fix, we should have a Junit Test or a something like. --Emmanuel