Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-directory-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 45110 invoked from network); 26 Nov 2005 11:47:20 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 26 Nov 2005 11:47:20 -0000 Received: (qmail 68525 invoked by uid 500); 26 Nov 2005 11:47:20 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-directory-dev-archive@directory.apache.org Received: (qmail 68400 invoked by uid 500); 26 Nov 2005 11:47:19 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@directory.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: "Apache Directory Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list dev@directory.apache.org Received: (qmail 68385 invoked by uid 99); 26 Nov 2005 11:47:19 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [192.87.106.226] (HELO ajax.apache.org) (192.87.106.226) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 26 Nov 2005 03:47:17 -0800 Received: from ajax.apache.org (ajax.apache.org [127.0.0.1]) by ajax.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0149021E for ; Sat, 26 Nov 2005 12:46:57 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <623161133.1133005617003.JavaMail.jira@ajax.apache.org> Date: Sat, 26 Nov 2005 12:46:57 +0100 (CET) From: "Matteo Merli (JIRA)" To: dev@directory.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (DIRMINA-51) Object serialization filter In-Reply-To: <2030449646.1117638895574.JavaMail.jira@ajax.apache.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N [ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRMINA-51?page=comments#action_12358553 ] Matteo Merli commented on DIRMINA-51: ------------------------------------- I see the problem. I took a look at xStream serialization framework and it looks very fine. I only have a concern about how the serialization filter would work with UDP transport. If the xml stream it's breaked on multiple packets, with UDP there is no garanties that packets will be received in the correct order. One solution can be that, when using UDP, the stream would be breaked in the filter and every packet would be carrying a sequence number. Then when all packets will be received the stream will be de-serialized. What do you think? > Object serialization filter > --------------------------- > > Key: DIRMINA-51 > URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRMINA-51 > Project: Directory MINA > Type: New Feature > Reporter: Trustin Lee > Assignee: Trustin Lee > Fix For: 0.9.1 > Attachments: SerializationFilter.java, TestSerialization.zip > > Users with no time to implement PDUs will be able to get a lot of benefit from this filter to test their protocol logic implementation. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira