Mailing-List: contact dev-help@directory.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: "Apache Directory Developers List" <dev@directory.apache.org>
Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: domain of lyndon.washington@gmail.com
 designates 64.233.162.207 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
        s=beta; d=gmail.com;
        h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references;
        b=XyNkXapoFfotfguj9g2m/NnRoaTu6G0vmfnmwt6wyH3uUqNAWc6f5CYklUy5OWiTns4Wgkajn4zlPXCZMHXJ2p6s4cI5ATEEYvI5ZZYJJjm+7gPMcdoX750ptvS2i12GDC7xKDS0dpkyjBZtWdtjra7t0216nVxp893d3cUxH+E=
Message-ID: <524960cd0511041049s17557ed7k657091cd52dda2a8@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 4 Nov 2005 13:49:47 -0500
From: Lyndon Washington <lyndon.washington@gmail.com>
To: Apache Directory Developers List <dev@directory.apache.org>
Subject: Re: OSGi RoadMap
In-Reply-To: <436BA0BE.4050908@apache.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
	boundary="----=_Part_3177_30155631.1131130187273"
References: <1131125604.4076.105.camel@trout> <436B9E90.9020607@bellsouth.net>
	 <436BA0BE.4050908@apache.org>

------=_Part_3177_30155631.1131130187273
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline

Not that these two issues are directly dependent on one another, but will
that mean that people who use Eclipse for the development environments,
would be able to integrate the "OSGi enable components" with the new
Equinox<http://www.eclipse.org/equinox/>project?

Cheers,
-Lyndon-

On 11/4/05, Enrique Rodriguez <enriquer9@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Alex Karasulu wrote:
> > John E. Conlon wrote:
> >
> >> Did not see any reference to OSGi in the Directory RoadMap at
> >> http://docs.safehaus.org/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=3D2394
> >>
> >> Can anyone shed some light on the current idea for when/if the
> Directory
> >> will support OSGi container? Previous dev traffic (i.e. - Another
> >> release (0.9.2) before we introduce OSGi) gave the impression it would
> >> be soon after the 0.9.2 ?
> >>
> >>
> > We're going to try to get 0.9.4 out with OSGi and m2 builds. We might
> > even flatten the directory structure a bunch in an eclipse like fashion
> > with package names for projects. We're getting ready. I think its
> > probably safe to say that OSGi will come in 0.9.4.
>
> John,
>
> The sticking point was lack of support for some key bundle building
> features in Maven ... which got addressed this week with the Felix M2
> Plugin. With that hurdle cleared we have started updating directories
> to follow the M2 standard layout and we'll start adding pom.xml's in
> parallel to the project.xml's.
>
> You'll also see us break up the core into finer-grained subprojects so
> we can address different use cases. For example, we have a JDK Prefs
> SPI implementation in the core that will spin off and be used to provide
> the OSGi Preferences Service backed by just the JNDI provider.
>
> Enrique
>

------=_Part_3177_30155631.1131130187273
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline

Not that these two issues are directly dependent on one another, but
will that mean that people who use Eclipse for the development
environments, would be able to integrate the &quot;OSGi enable components&q=
uot;
with the new <a href=3D"http://www.eclipse.org/equinox/">Equinox</a> projec=
t?<br>
<br>
Cheers,<br>
-Lyndon-<br>
<br><div><span class=3D"gmail_quote">On 11/4/05, <b class=3D"gmail_senderna=
me">Enrique Rodriguez</b> &lt;<a href=3D"mailto:enriquer9@gmail.com">enriqu=
er9@gmail.com</a>&gt; wrote:</span><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=
=3D"border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; p=
adding-left: 1ex;">
Alex Karasulu wrote:<br>&gt; John E. Conlon wrote:<br>&gt;<br>&gt;&gt; Did =
not see any reference to OSGi in the Directory RoadMap at<br>&gt;&gt; <a hr=
ef=3D"http://docs.safehaus.org/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=3D2394">http://=
docs.safehaus.org/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=3D2394
</a><br>&gt;&gt;<br>&gt;&gt; Can anyone shed some light on the current idea=
 for when/if the Directory<br>&gt;&gt; will support OSGi container?&nbsp;&n=
bsp;Previous dev traffic (i.e. - Another<br>&gt;&gt; release (0.9.2) before=
 we introduce OSGi) gave the impression it would
<br>&gt;&gt; be soon after the 0.9.2 ?<br>&gt;&gt;<br>&gt;&gt;<br>&gt; We'r=
e going to try to get 0.9.4 out with OSGi and m2 builds.&nbsp;&nbsp;We migh=
t<br>&gt; even flatten the directory structure a bunch in an eclipse like f=
ashion
<br>&gt; with package names for projects.&nbsp;&nbsp;We're getting ready.&n=
bsp;&nbsp;I think its<br>&gt; probably safe to say that OSGi will come in 0=
.9.4.<br><br>John,<br><br>The sticking point was lack of support for some k=
ey bundle building
<br>features in Maven ... which got addressed this week with the Felix M2<b=
r>Plugin.&nbsp;&nbsp;With that hurdle cleared we have started updating dire=
ctories<br>to follow the M2 standard layout and we'll start adding pom.xml'=
s in<br>
parallel to the project.xml's.<br><br>You'll also see us break up the core =
into finer-grained subprojects so<br>we can address different use cases.&nb=
sp;&nbsp;For example, we have a JDK Prefs<br>SPI implementation in the core=
 that will spin off and be used to provide
<br>the OSGi Preferences Service backed by just the JNDI provider.<br><br>E=
nrique<br></blockquote></div><br><br clear=3D"all"><br>

------=_Part_3177_30155631.1131130187273--