Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-directory-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 55011 invoked from network); 24 Nov 2005 10:26:10 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 24 Nov 2005 10:26:10 -0000 Received: (qmail 6844 invoked by uid 500); 24 Nov 2005 10:26:09 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-directory-dev-archive@directory.apache.org Received: (qmail 6797 invoked by uid 500); 24 Nov 2005 10:26:09 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@directory.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: "Apache Directory Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list dev@directory.apache.org Received: (qmail 6786 invoked by uid 99); 24 Nov 2005 10:26:08 -0000 Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (140.211.166.49) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 24 Nov 2005 02:26:08 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (asf.osuosl.org: local policy) Received: from [193.252.22.21] (HELO smtp10.wanadoo.fr) (193.252.22.21) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 24 Nov 2005 02:27:39 -0800 Received: from me-wanadoo.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mwinf1004.wanadoo.fr (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 91BB72400124 for ; Thu, 24 Nov 2005 11:25:46 +0100 (CET) Received: from [10.0.0.209] (LSt-Amand-152-32-10-236.w82-127.abo.wanadoo.fr [82.127.25.236]) by mwinf1004.wanadoo.fr (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 6E7782400121 for ; Thu, 24 Nov 2005 11:25:46 +0100 (CET) X-ME-UUID: 20051124102546452.6E7782400121@mwinf1004.wanadoo.fr Subject: Re: svn commit: r348695 - /directory/sandbox/ersiner/checkout-directory-new.sh From: Emmanuel =?ISO-8859-1?Q?L=E9charny?= To: dev@directory.apache.org In-Reply-To: <20051124092111.16123.qmail@minotaur.apache.org> References: <20051124092111.16123.qmail@minotaur.apache.org> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Thu, 24 Nov 2005 11:25:45 +0100 Message-Id: <1132827945.8086.38.camel@portable> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.2.1.1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Hi Ersin, looking at your last commit, I saw : > -#!/bin/sh > +#!/bin/bash I don't think that it's a good idea to change the shell from sh to bash. I'm not sure that solaris systems provide bash natively, and on linux system, sh resolve to bash. As a general rule, we should always use sh to be sure that the script will run on every *ix system ! -- Emmanuel