directory-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Jose Alberto Fernandez" <jalbe...@cellectivity.com>
Subject [MINA] RE: [jira] Closed: (DIRMINA-126) ByteBuffer.get/putObject()
Date Tue, 29 Nov 2005 11:30:13 GMT
Does this means that the client needs to use a different serialization
infrastructure than the one provided by the JDK?

It would be nice if a client using regular JDK APIs and hence encodings
could talk to a highly performant MINA server. This is particularly
important for small clients, RMI implementations and such.

Same for the pascalStrings are they compatible with what read/writeUTF
produces?

Jose Alberto

> From: Trustin Lee (JIRA) [mailto:jira@apache.org]
> 
>      [ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRMINA-126?page=all ]
> 
> Trustin Lee closed DIRMINA-126:
> -------------------------------
> 
>     Fix Version: 0.9
>                      (was: 0.9.1)
>      Resolution: Fixed
> 
> I used ObjectInput/OutputStream to implement this feature.
> read/writeClassDescriptor() method is overridden to minimize the size
of
> the serialized data.
> 
> > ByteBuffer.get/putObject()
> > --------------------------
> >
> >          Key: DIRMINA-126
> >          URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRMINA-126
> >      Project: Directory MINA
> >         Type: New Feature
> >     Reporter: Trustin Lee
> >     Assignee: Trustin Lee
> >     Priority: Minor
> >      Fix For: 0.9
> 
> >
> > Adding get/putObject() to ByteBuffer will make protocol
implementor's
> life very easier.  What we have to consider are the possible
performance
> hit and the size of the serialized data.
> 
> --
> This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
> -
> If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the
administrators:
>    http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
> -
> For more information on JIRA, see:
>    http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira


Mime
View raw message