Mailing-List: contact dev-help@directory.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: "Apache Directory Developers List" <dev@directory.apache.org>
Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: local policy)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v733)
In-Reply-To: <1129068125.13190.51.camel@wkslx01.iktek.com>
References: <NBBBJGEAGJAKLIDBKJOPGEMIDOAC.noel@devtech.com>
 <1129068125.13190.51.camel@wkslx01.iktek.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed
Message-Id: <390FF7AA-AB42-4AB2-9FAC-671D40EBEBB1@atlassian.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Nick Faiz <nick@atlassian.com>
Subject: Re: upgrading to nlog4j.1.2.17
Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2005 08:17:20 +1000
To: "Apache Directory Developers List" <dev@directory.apache.org>

Hey Emmanuel,

On 12/10/2005, at 8:02 AM, Emmanuel Lecharny wrote:
>
> Yeah, I used it and still does, but I didn't browsed at the code. I
> didn't saw tomcat as something embeddable, too. I don't know either if
> Tomcat has issue with Logging jars, so I can't say if they have made
> this choice for any good reason, or not.
>

I actually saw a JIRA issue open at JBoss for adopting SLF4J a while  
ago. :) I don't know if they did or not.

http://www.jboss.org/?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3889840 (after a quick  
google).

> Guys, I just want to add three points :
>  - first, excuse my english that forgives me to be as subtil and
> diplomatic as I would like to be,

No prob.s. :)

>  - second, I really understand Nick point, and I really think it  
> should
> be addressed, but I'm just not sure that it's the right pace to do it.

Okay. I understand that it might seem like a noisy chat about SLF4J,  
not ApacheDS.

My motive is simple. I am only concerned about logging for ApacheDS.  
It has become an ApacheDS issue.

>  - third, I think that Ceki did a lot of good job, he also really  
> helped
> us, and I don't want him to think that we think that log4j is a  
> pile of
> bok...
>

Agreed.


Cheers,
Nick

> -- Emmanuel
>
>