Return-Path: 
 <dev-return-8336-apmail-directory-dev-archive=directory.apache.org@directory.apache.org>
Delivered-To: apmail-directory-dev-archive@www.apache.org
Received: (qmail 78756 invoked from network); 11 Oct 2005 19:10:09 -0000
Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199)
  by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 11 Oct 2005 19:10:09 -0000
Received: (qmail 61768 invoked by uid 500); 11 Oct 2005 19:10:07 -0000
Delivered-To: apmail-directory-dev-archive@directory.apache.org
Received: (qmail 61625 invoked by uid 500); 11 Oct 2005 19:10:06 -0000
Mailing-List: contact dev-help@directory.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:dev-help@directory.apache.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:dev-unsubscribe@directory.apache.org>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@directory.apache.org>
List-Id: <dev.directory.apache.org>
Reply-To: "Apache Directory Developers List" <dev@directory.apache.org>
Delivered-To: mailing list dev@directory.apache.org
Received: (qmail 61614 invoked by uid 99); 11 Oct 2005 19:10:06 -0000
Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (140.211.166.49)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 11 Oct 2005 12:10:06 -0700
X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0
	tests=
X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org
Received-SPF: neutral (asf.osuosl.org: local policy)
Received: from [193.252.22.28] (HELO smtp3.wanadoo.fr) (193.252.22.28)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 11 Oct 2005 12:10:08 -0700
Received: from me-wanadoo.net (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by mwinf0309.wanadoo.fr (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 5D34B1C00788
	for <dev@directory.apache.org>; Tue, 11 Oct 2005 21:09:43 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [192.168.0.20] (LNeuilly-152-23-26-32.w193-252.abo.wanadoo.fr
 [193.252.40.32])
	by mwinf0309.wanadoo.fr (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 2717A1C007F1
	for <dev@directory.apache.org>; Tue, 11 Oct 2005 21:09:43 +0200 (CEST)
X-ME-UUID: 20051011190943160.2717A1C007F1@mwinf0309.wanadoo.fr
Subject: RE: upgrading to nlog4j.1.2.17
From: Emmanuel Lecharny <elecharny@apache.org>
To: Apache Directory Developers List <dev@directory.apache.org>
In-Reply-To: <NBBBJGEAGJAKLIDBKJOPEELADOAC.noel@devtech.com>
References: <NBBBJGEAGJAKLIDBKJOPEELADOAC.noel@devtech.com>
Content-Type: text/plain
Organization: iktek
Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2005 21:09:14 +0200
Message-Id: <1129057754.13190.23.camel@wkslx01.iktek.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.4 (2.0.4-6) 
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org
X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N

On Tue, 2005-10-11 at 11:59 -0400, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
<snip/>
> And at this point, since we have a standard, perhaps
> it is time to follow Tomcat's lead: ditch all other logging APIs, and use
> the standard.  If the standard needs change, that can happen via the JCP.
> Log4J and others would still have their place as implementations of the
> standard, but as APIs they would go away.

Not that this thread is boring, but I think that pros/cons of using
slf4j/log4j/nlog4j/whatever4j could be posted to the best mailing list
for that : log4XXX-dev or log4XXX-user mailing lists.

As far as ApacheDS is concerned, and it seems to be, there is no urge to
change a choice made back in July, 6. We have a 1.0 version to deliver,
and we can still change things between the 1.0-beta and 1.0 GA.

Right now, I'm sure that Alex will give us some clue about how to embed
ApacheDS in another application, including the way the logging system
should be used, as he will have a session at San Diego ApacheCon US 2005
(http://apachecon.com/2005/US/html/sessions.html#1510) (Yeah !)

PS : Ceki, Log4j still rocks ! I personally never met a project using
Java SDK logging... Darwin again ?

-- Emmanuel