Ceki Gülcü wrote:

> A vanilla log4j binding for SLF4J could alleviate nlog4j/log4j
> compatibility problems that we suspect may arise. The vanilla log4j
> binding with SLF4J would be similar to the JDK 1.4 binding that
> currently exists. It would require an official version of log4j.jar
> (as distributed by http://logging.apache.org) to be present on the
> class path.
>
> You can expect such a binding to be available on October 21st, but
> probably before that.
>
> How does that sound?
>
Perfect! Thanks Ceki and Nick for persevering on this issue.

Alex