directory-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Ersin Er <ersin...@gmail.com>
Subject Interface/Class naming inconsistencies
Date Thu, 13 Oct 2005 08:02:39 GMT
Hi,

It seems that we do not have a consistent naming convention for
interfaces and their implementor classes. For example, when the
interface is named Foo, we may have implementor classes named like
FooImpl, BaseFoo, DefaultFoo, etc.

Which one do you think is correct (or makes sense the most)?

Cheers.
--
Ersin
Mime
View raw message