directory-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Alex Karasulu <>
Subject Re: Flexibility in grammars ( ACIItem grammar in particular )
Date Wed, 19 Oct 2005 15:16:39 GMT
Ersin Er wrote:

>I've just updated ACIItem grammar to provide more flexibility as Alex
>requested here:
>What I've done is to allow any order of components for ProtectedItems
>and UserClasses. These two sequences contain lots of optional
>components. So it make sense to have them in any order. Do you think
>that we should extend this flexibility for most of the rules, even
>non-optional ones ?
Yah good point.  Perhaps we should do it for all.  If we prefix the 
component with a name then it's basically addressed by name and position 
does not matter.  I think its a good idea to do all of them for consistency.


View raw message