directory-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jérôme Baumgarten <jbaumgar...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Interface/Class naming inconsistencies
Date Mon, 17 Oct 2005 18:41:19 GMT
IBM folks do the same, they put an uppercase i in front of interface names.

Jerome

On 10/13/05, Emmanuel Lecharny <elecharny@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, 2005-10-13 at 11:02 +0300, Ersin Er wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > It seems that we do not have a consistent naming convention for
> > interfaces and their implementor classes. For example, when the
> > interface is named Foo, we may have implementor classes named like
> > FooImpl, BaseFoo, DefaultFoo, etc.
> >
> > Which one do you think is correct (or makes sense the most)?
>
> well, that's a good question... Personnaly, I like to add a I to
> interface names (IFoo), but this is a kind of M$ hungarylish footprint.
>
> So FooImpl seems to be the best solution to me, but that's just my own
> personnal opinion.
>
> >
> > Cheers.
> > --
> > Ersin
>
>
>

Mime
View raw message