directory-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Trustin Lee <trus...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Discussion on porting X.500 ACIItem to LDAP
Date Thu, 15 Sep 2005 17:02:25 GMT
Hi,

2005/9/16, Alex Karasulu <aok123@bellsouth.net>:
> 
> >It's a good idea to keep unused bits reserved. Then we'll be compatible
> >with X.501 and save space a lot. I liked this.
> +1 to use the bit string index in the spec as the index into the bit
> string for all these reasons.


+1, too.

>If Trustin provides me a constructor that takes a String then i'll not
> >care if he uses your stuff or his own :-) But we should first be sure if
> >we'll use bit-list or bstring form. After Alex and Trustin says final
> >thoughts i'll finish it up.
> >
> Can you elaborate on the differences between bit-list and bstring? How
> would these differences manifest themselves in a Java representations of
> the grantsAndDenials?


I don't understand this, either. Could you give me some example? 

Trustin
-- 
what we call human nature is actually human habit
--
http://gleamynode.net/

Mime
View raw message