From dev-return-7196-apmail-directory-dev-archive=directory.apache.org@directory.apache.org Tue Aug 09 02:13:41 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-directory-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 9552 invoked from network); 9 Aug 2005 02:13:41 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 9 Aug 2005 02:13:41 -0000 Received: (qmail 10229 invoked by uid 500); 9 Aug 2005 02:13:40 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-directory-dev-archive@directory.apache.org Received: (qmail 10166 invoked by uid 500); 9 Aug 2005 02:13:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@directory.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: "Apache Directory Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list dev@directory.apache.org Received: (qmail 10153 invoked by uid 99); 9 Aug 2005 02:13:39 -0000 Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (140.211.166.49) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 08 Aug 2005 19:13:39 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: local policy) Received: from [157.22.36.8] (HELO mail.plushpix.com) (157.22.36.8) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 08 Aug 2005 19:14:01 -0700 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mail.plushpix.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 14788F9C3 for ; Mon, 8 Aug 2005 19:40:44 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 8 Aug 2005 19:40:44 -0700 (PDT) From: Alex Burmester Reply-To: To: Subject: mina: deploy on 0.7.4 or later? Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Hi all, I have a production mina app deployed on 0.7.3 We do releases about once a month and and I probably have two releases left before we code freeze for the christmas season. I'm wondering if I should be trying to stick with the 0.7 branch and upgrade to 0.7.4 on my next release or if I should start the migration to the new api in the 0.9 mina. I'd prefer to go with whichever is likely to be the most stable and so far 0.7 has been working fine for us but I don't want to fall too far behind the current development. I also seem to be running into a memory leak with java.nio.HeapByteBuffer and it might be the same thing that was reported with the wrap() call. I'll have to go look at the docs since there's a reference to something about wrap() in the issue tracker. Thanks, Alex.