Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-directory-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 66173 invoked from network); 3 Jul 2005 16:57:07 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 3 Jul 2005 16:57:07 -0000 Received: (qmail 57493 invoked by uid 500); 3 Jul 2005 16:57:03 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-directory-dev-archive@directory.apache.org Received: (qmail 57450 invoked by uid 500); 3 Jul 2005 16:57:02 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@directory.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: "Apache Directory Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list dev@directory.apache.org Received: (qmail 57372 invoked by uid 99); 3 Jul 2005 16:57:00 -0000 Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (140.211.166.49) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 03 Jul 2005 09:57:00 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.5 required=10.0 tests=FROM_ENDS_IN_NUMS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (asf.osuosl.org: 206.113.87.227 is neither permitted nor denied by domain of aok123@bellsouth.net) Received: from [206.113.87.227] (HELO IPOfCard1.guest-tek.com) (206.113.87.227) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 03 Jul 2005 09:57:01 -0700 Received: from [172.17.188.247] ([172.17.188.247]) by IPOfCard1.guest-tek.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id j63GukY07086 for ; Sun, 3 Jul 2005 12:56:46 -0400 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v728) In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Alex Karasulu Subject: Re: [mina] Which branch to use Date: Sun, 3 Jul 2005 12:56:49 -0400 To: "Apache Directory Developers List" X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.728) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N On Jul 3, 2005, at 9:52 AM, Matteo Merli wrote: > Hi I'm starting the development of an application from scratch using > mina as the underlying network framework.. I've seen that the current > branches are "0.7" and "trunk".. > I've also noted that there are API differences between those branches > (like ProtocolProvider that is not present in trunk). > I had no idea that ProtocolProvider was removed from the trunk. Trustin can you elaborate on this a bit. All I know is the trunk is the new 0.7.3 branch and the leading edge of development for MINA. We are currently using 0.7.3. I think Trustin intends to release 0.7.3 soon. However I would like more clarification on the presence of the PP interface. This is important to the rest of directory since our entire terminology is based upon this concept. > So my question is: what branch should I took and work on? Considers > that I don't have to ship the application right now cause it's in > early stage of development.. so which branch will be used for the > "next" version of mina? > Until Trustin elaborates some more I think the trunk is the best place if you're just starting out. Good luck, Alex